The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Approaching the limits of transparency and conductivity in graphitic materials through lithium intercalation
Open accessAbstract
Various band structure engineering methods have been studied to improve the performance of graphitic transparent conductors; however, none has demonstrated an increase of optical transmittance in the visible range. Here we measure in situ optical transmittance spectra and electrical transport properties of ultrathin graphite (3–60 graphene layers) simultaneously during electrochemical lithiation/delithiation. On intercalation, we observe an increase of both optical transmittance (up to twofold) and electrical conductivity (up to two orders of magnitude), strikingly different from other materials. Transmission as high as 91.7% with a sheet resistance of 3.0 Ω per square is achieved for 19-layer LiC6, which corresponds to a figure of merit σdc/σopt=1,400, significantly higher than any other continuous transparent electrodes. The unconventional modification of ultrathin graphite optoelectronic properties is explained by the suppression of interband optical transitions and a small intraband Drude conductivity near the interband edge. Our techniques enable investigation of other aspects of intercalation in nanostructures. Graphene-based materials have potential as transparent electrodes, but still fall short of desired performance goals. Here, Bao et al.report that upon intercalation of lithium into few-layer graphene, desired sheet resistance and optical transmittance may be achieved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The electronic properties of graphene
Castro Neto, A. H., Guinea, F., Peres, N. M. R., Novoselov, K. S., & Geim, A. K. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.109 · Cited by 24,803
Thermal properties of graphene and nanostructured carbon materials
Balandin, A. A. (2011) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3064 · Cited by 6,244
Cited by
Potassium Ion Batteries with Graphitic Materials
Luo, W., Wan, J., Ozdemir, B., Bao, W., Chen, Y., Dai, J., Lin, H., Xu, Y., Gu, F., Barone, V., et al. (2015) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03667 · Cited by 929
Self-citationElectrochromic energy storage devices
Yang, P., Sun, P., & Mai, W. (2016) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2015.11.007 · Cited by 572
Monolayer atomic crystal molecular superlattices
Wang, C., He, Q., Halim, U., Liu, Y., Zhu, E., Lin, Z., Xiao, H., Duan, X., Feng, Z., Cheng, R., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25774 · Cited by 444
Synthesis, structure and applications of graphene-based 2D heterostructures
Solís-Fernández, P., Bissett, M., & Ago, H. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00160f · Cited by 371
Rapid mass production of two-dimensional metal oxides and hydroxides via the molten salts method
Hu, Z., Xiao, X., Jin, H., Li, T., Chen, M., Liang, Z., Guo, Z., Li, J., Wan, J., Huang, L., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15630 · Cited by 328
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bao, W., Wan, J., Han, X., Cai, X., Zhu, H., Kim, D., Ma, D., Xu, Y., Munday, J. N., Drew, H. D., Fuhrer, M. S., & Hu, L.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2014-07-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4224-4224
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104281862
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.