Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 820

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A highly abundant bacteriophage discovered in the unknown sequences of human faecal metagenomes

Open access
Dutilh, Bas E., Cassman, Noriko, McNair, Katelyn, Sanchez, Savannah E., Silva, Genivaldo G. Z., Boling, Lance, Barr, Jeremy J., Speth, Daan R., Seguritan, Victor, Aziz, Ramy K., Felts, Ben, Dinsdale, Elizabeth A., Mokili, John L., Edwards, Robert A.·2014·Nature Communications

Abstract

Metagenomics, or sequencing of the genetic material from a complete microbial community, is a promising tool to discover novel microbes and viruses. Viral metagenomes typically contain many unknown sequences. Here we describe the discovery of a previously unidentified bacteriophage present in the majority of published human faecal metagenomes, which we refer to as crAssphage. Its ~97 kbp genome is six times more abundant in publicly available metagenomes than all other known phages together; it comprises up to 90% and 22% of all reads in virus-like particle (VLP)-derived metagenomes and total community metagenomes, respectively; and it totals 1.68% of all human faecal metagenomic sequencing reads in the public databases. The majority of crAssphage-encoded proteins match no known sequences in the database, which is why it was not detected before. Using a new co-occurrence profiling approach, we predict a Bacteroides host for this phage, consistent with Bacteroides-related protein homologues and a unique carbohydrate-binding domain encoded in the phage genome. Metagenomic studies of microbial communities often report DNA sequences from unidentified viruses. Here, Dutilh et al. analyse metagenomic data to reveal the complete genome of an abundant, ubiquitous virus from human faeces, and predict that the virus infects bacteria of the Bacteroides group.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms5498

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 820

Metadata

Authors
Dutilh, B. E., Cassman, N., McNair, K., Sanchez, S. E., Silva, G. G. Z., Boling, L., Barr, J. J., Speth, D. R., Seguritan, V., Aziz, R. K., Felts, B., Dinsdale, E. A., Mokili, J. L., & Edwards, R. A.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2014-07-24
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
4498-4498
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966912927
Cited by
820
References
15
FWCI
35.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A highly abundant bacteriophage discovered in the unknown sequences of human faecal metagenomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ncomms5498
The paper
Dutilh, B. E., Cassman, N., McNair, K., Sanchez, S. E., Silva, G. G. Z., Boling, L., Barr, J. J., Speth, D. R., Seguritan, V., Aziz, R. K., Felts, B., Dinsdale, E. A., Mokili, J. L., & Edwards, R. A. (2014). A highly abundant bacteriophage discovered in the unknown sequences of human faecal metagenomes. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5498

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.