The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Causality-driven slow-down and speed-up of diffusion in non-Markovian temporal networks
Open accessAbstract
Recent research has highlighted limitations of studying complex systems with time-varying topologies from the perspective of static, time-aggregated networks. Non-Markovian characteristics resulting from the ordering of interactions in temporal networks were identified as one important mechanism that alters causality and affects dynamical processes. So far, an analytical explanation for this phenomenon and for the significant variations observed across different systems is missing. Here we introduce a methodology that allows to analytically predict causality-driven changes of diffusion speed in non-Markovian temporal networks. Validating our predictions in six data sets we show that compared with the time-aggregated network, non-Markovian characteristics can lead to both a slow-down or speed-up of diffusion, which can even outweigh the decelerating effect of community structures in the static topology. Thus, non-Markovian properties of temporal networks constitute an important additional dimension of complexity in time-varying complex systems. In complex networks, non-Markovianity is an important mechanism affecting causality and the dynamics of a process. Here, Scholtes et al.introduce an analytical approach to study non-Markovian temporal networks, allowing to predict causality-driven changes of diffusion speed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Elements of Information Theory
Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (2005) · doi:10.1002/047174882x · Cited by 13,791
Holme, P., & Saramäki, J. (2012) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.03.001 · Cited by 2,736 · cited 1×
“By this, we mean that a path ( a, b ) → ( b, c ) in a time-aggregated network does not imply that a and c are connected via a time-respecting path in the underlying temporal network [9, 15].”
BackgroundActivity driven modeling of time varying networks
Perra, N., Gonçalves, B., Pastor-Satorras, R., & Vespignani, A. (2012) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00469 · Cited by 709
Dynamics and Control of Diseases in Networks with Community Structure
Salathé, M., & Jones, J. H. (2010) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000736 · Cited by 586
Cited by
Modern temporal network theory: a colloquium
Holme, P. (2015) · The European Physical Journal B · doi:10.1140/epjb/e2015-60657-4 · Cited by 734
Random walks and diffusion on networks
Masuda, N., Porter, M. A., & Lambiotte, R. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.07.007 · Cited by 657
Diffusion in networks and the virtue of burstiness
Akbarpour, M., & Jackson, M. O. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1722089115 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Scholtes, I., Wider, N., Pfitzner, R., Garas, A., Tessone, C. J., & Schweitzer, F.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2014-09-24
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5024-5024
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021046139
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 17.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Causality-driven slow-down and speed-up of diffusion in non-Markovian temporal networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ncomms6024
- The paper
- Scholtes, I., Wider, N., Pfitzner, R., Garas, A., Tessone, C. J., & Schweitzer, F. (2014). Causality-driven slow-down and speed-up of diffusion in non-Markovian temporal networks. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.