The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Suppressing qubit dephasing using real-time Hamiltonian estimation
Open accessAbstract
Unwanted interaction between a quantum system and its fluctuating environment leads to decoherence and is the primary obstacle to establishing a scalable quantum information processing architecture. Strategies such as environmental and materials engineering, quantum error correction and dynamical decoupling can mitigate decoherence, but generally increase experimental complexity. Here we improve coherence in a qubit using real-time Hamiltonian parameter estimation. Using a rapidly converging Bayesian approach, we precisely measure the splitting in a singlet-triplet spin qubit faster than the surrounding nuclear bath fluctuates. We continuously adjust qubit control parameters based on this information, thereby improving the inhomogenously broadened coherence time "Equation missing" from tens of nanoseconds to >2 μs. Because the technique demonstrated here is compatible with arbitrary qubit operations, it is a natural complement to quantum error correction and can be used to improve the performance of a wide variety of qubits in both meteorological and quantum information processing applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Hite, D. A., Colombe, Y., Wilson, A. C., Brown, K. R., Warring, U., Jördens, R., Jost, J. D., McKay, K. S., Pappas, D. P., Leibfried, D., et al. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.103001 · Cited by 176
Cited by
Materials challenges and opportunities for quantum computing hardware
de Leon, N. P., Itoh, K. M., Kim, D., Mehta, K. K., Northup, T. E., Paik, H., Palmer, B. S., Samarth, N., Sangtawesin, S., & Steuerman, D. W. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb2823 · Cited by 710
Interfacing spin qubits in quantum dots and donors—hot, dense, and coherent
Vandersypen, L. M. K., Bluhm, H., Clarke, J. S., Dzurak, A. S., Ishihara, R., Morello, A., Reilly, D. J., Schreiber, L. R., & Veldhorst, M. (2017) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-017-0038-y · Cited by 624
Fast universal quantum gate above the fault-tolerance threshold in silicon
Noiri, A., Takeda, K., Nakajima, T., Kobayashi, T., Sammak, A., Scappucci, G., & Tarucha, S. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04182-y · Cited by 471
Universal Quantum Transducers Based on Surface Acoustic Waves
Schuetz, M. J. A., Kessler, E. M., Giedke, G., Vandersypen, L. M. K., Lukin, M. D., & Cirac, J. I. (2015) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.5.031031 · Cited by 258
Mid-circuit correction of correlated phase errors using an array of spectator qubits
Singh, K., Bradley, C. E., Anand, S., Ramesh, V., White, R., & Bernien, H. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ade5337 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Shulman, M. D., Harvey, S. P., Nichol, J. M., Bartlett, S. D., Doherty, A. C., Umansky, V., & Yacoby, A.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2014-10-08
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5156-5156
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107705880
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Suppressing qubit dephasing using real-time Hamiltonian estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ncomms6156
- The paper
- Shulman, M. D., Harvey, S. P., Nichol, J. M., Bartlett, S. D., Doherty, A. C., Umansky, V., & Yacoby, A. (2014). Suppressing qubit dephasing using real-time Hamiltonian estimation. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6156
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.