Cited by 336Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon ResearchOrbital Angular Momentum in OpticsMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications

Spin–orbit coupling in surface plasmon scattering by nanostructures

Open access
O’Connor, D., Ginzburg, P., Rodríguez-Fortuño, F. J., Wurtz, G. A., Zayats, A. V.·2014·Nature Communications

Abstract

The spin Hall effect leads to the separation of electrons with opposite spins in different directions perpendicular to the electric current flow because of interaction between spin and orbital angular momenta. Similarly, photons with opposite spins (different handedness of circular light polarization) may take different trajectories when interacting with metasurfaces that break spatial inversion symmetry or when the inversion symmetry is broken by the radiation of a dipole near an interface. Here we demonstrate a reciprocal effect of spin-orbit coupling when the direction of propagation of a surface plasmon wave, which intrinsically has unusual transverse spin, determines a scattering direction of spin-carrying photons. This spin-orbit coupling effect is an optical analogue of the spin injection in solid-state spintronic devices (inverse spin Hall effect) and may be important for optical information processing, quantum optical technology and topological surface metrology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms6327

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Berry connection and Berry curvature immediately appear in all intrinsic SOI phenomena, such as the spin-Hall effect.

    “Therefore, the Berry connection and Berry curvature immediately appear in all intrinsic SOI phenomena, such as the spin-Hall effect.”

    From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [61]

    The introduction (p. 2) identifies the spin Hall effect as arising from spin–orbit coupling and lists Berry phase as one way to engineer optical spin–orbit coupling. It does not discuss Berry connection or Berry curvature, or establish that they appear in all intrinsic spin–orbit-interaction phenomena. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Two fundamental concepts underpin the SOI of light: optical angular momentum and geometric (Berry) phases for light.

    “Two important fundamental concepts underpin the SOI of light: optical angular momentum 57- 59 and geometric (Berry) phases for light 60- 62 .”

    From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [61]

  • Geometric phases in optics originate from the coupling between intrinsic angular momentum and rotations of coordinates.

    “Geometric phases in optics originate from the coupling between intrinsic angular momentum and rotations of coordinates .”

    From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [61]

    The introduction (p. 2) mentions Berry phase as a way to engineer optical spin–orbit coupling, while the Results (p. 3) discuss spin angular momentum in surface plasmons. Neither passage explains the origin of geometric phases as coupling between intrinsic angular momentum and rotations of coordinates; searches for that relationship found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 336

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]1. Dyakonov, M. I. & Perel, V. I. Possibility of orientating electron spins with current. Sov. Phys. JETP Lett. 13, 467 (1971).

Authors
O’Connor, D., Ginzburg, P., Rodríguez-Fortuño, F. J., Wurtz, G. A., & Zayats, A. V.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • ITMO University (RU)
Corresponding author
Zayats, A. V.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2014-11-13
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
5327-5327
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982657959
Cited by
336
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 1
FWCI
10.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (TEC2011-28664-C02)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/H000917/2)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Keywords
spin-orbit coupling, surface plasmon polaritons, spin Hall effect, inverse spin Hall effect, circular polarization, directional light scattering, nanostructured surfaces, metasurfaces, inversion symmetry breaking, spin injection, optical information processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review