The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nacre-mimetics with synthetic nanoclays up to ultrahigh aspect ratios
Open accessAbstract
Nacre-mimetics hold great promise as mechanical high-performance and functional materials. Here we demonstrate large progress of mechanical and functional properties of self-assembled polymer/nanoclay nacre-mimetics by using synthetic nanoclays with aspect ratios covering three orders in magnitude (25–3,500). We establish comprehensive relationships among structure formation, nanostructuration, deformation mechanisms and mechanical properties as a function of nanoclay aspect ratio, and by tuning the viscoelastic properties of the soft phase via hydration. Highly ordered, large-scale nacre-mimetics are obtained even for low aspect ratio nanoplatelets and show pronounced inelastic deformation with very high toughness, while those formed by ultralarge nanoplatelets exhibit superb stiffness and strength, previously only reachable for highly crosslinked materials. Regarding functionalities, we report formerly impossible glass-like transparency, and excellent gas barrier considerably exceeding earlier nacre-mimetics based on natural nanoclay. Our study enables rational design of future high-performance nacre-mimetic materials and opens avenues for ecofriendly, transparent, self-standing and strong advanced barrier materials. Nacre-mimetics hold great promise as high-performance, functional materials. Here, the authors use synthetic nanoclays and demonstrate tuneable mechanical properties by varying the nanoclay aspect ratio, and suggest a transparent gas barrier application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biological materials: Structure and mechanical properties
Meyers, M. A., Chen, P.-Y., Lin, A. Y.-M., & Seki, Y. (2008) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2007.05.002 · Cited by 2,573
Tough, Bio-Inspired Hybrid Materials
Munch, E., Launey, M. E., Alsem, D. H., Saiz, E., Tomsia, A. P., & Ritchie, R. O. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1164865 · Cited by 1,822
Cited by
Synthetic nacre by predesigned matrix-directed mineralization
Mao, L.-B., Gao, H.-L., Yao, H.-B., Liu, L., Cölfen, H., Liu, G., Chen, S.-M., Li, S.-K., Yan, Y.-X., Liu, Y.-Y., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf8991 · Cited by 983
Hierarchically structured bioinspired nanocomposites
Nepal, D., Kang, S., Adstedt, K. M., Kanhaiya, K., Bockstaller, M. R., Brinson, L. C., Buehler, M. J., Coveney, P. V., Dayal, K., El-Awady, J. A., et al. (2023) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-022-01384-1 · Cited by 594
Nanosized microporous crystals: emerging applications
Mintova, S., Jaber, M., & Valtchev, V. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00210a · Cited by 385
Wan, S., Peng, J., Li, Y., Hu, H., Jiang, L., & Cheng, Q. (2015) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b02902 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Das, P., Malho, J.-M., Rahimi, K., Schacher, F. H., Wang, B., Demco, D. E., & Walther, A.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2015-01-20
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5967-5967
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969101619
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.