Cited by 228FOXO transcription factor regulationMetabolism, Diabetes, and CancerPancreatic function and diabetes

FoxO1 integrates direct and indirect effects of insulin on hepatic glucose production and glucose utilization

Open access
O-Sullivan, InSug, Zhang, Wenwei, Wasserman, David H., Liew, Chong Wee, Liu, Jonathan, Paik, Jihye, DePinho, Ronald A., Stolz, Donna Beer +3 more·2015·Nature Communications

Abstract

FoxO proteins are major targets of insulin action. To better define the role of FoxO1 in mediating insulin effects in the liver, we generated liver-specific insulin receptor knockout (LIRKO) and IR/FoxO1 double knockout (LIRFKO) mice. Here we show that LIRKO mice are severely insulin resistant based on glucose, insulin and C-peptide levels, and glucose and insulin tolerance tests, and genetic deletion of hepatic FoxO1 reverses these effects. 13C-glucose and insulin clamp studies indicate that regulation of both hepatic glucose production (HGP) and glucose utilization is impaired in LIRKO mice, and these defects are also restored in LIRFKO mice corresponding to changes in gene expression. We conclude that (1) inhibition of FoxO1 is critical for both direct (hepatic) and indirect effects of insulin on HGP and utilization, and (2) extrahepatic effects of insulin are sufficient to maintain normal whole-body and hepatic glucose metabolism when liver FoxO1 activity is disrupted. Insulin and the transcription factor FoxO1 are key regulators of glucose metabolism. Using mice that lack insulin receptor and FoxO1 in the liver, O-Sullivan et al.show that extrahepatic effects of insulin are sufficient to maintain glucose homeostasis when hepatic FoxO1 is disrupted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms8079

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intact hepatic insulin signaling is dispensable for the postprandial repression of hepatic glucose production in the absence of hepatic FoxO1, highlighting the importance of hypothalamic insulin signaling in the control of liver glucose metabolism.

    “Intact hepatic insulin signaling is, however, dispensable for the postprandial repression of hepatic glucose production in the absence of hepatic FoxO1 32, 33, highlighting the importance of hypothalamic insulin signaling in the control of liver glucose metabolism 34.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 228

Authors
O-Sullivan, I., Zhang, W., Wasserman, D. H., Liew, C. W., Liu, J., Paik, J., DePinho, R. A., Stolz, D. B., Kahn, C. R., Schwartz, M. W., & Unterman, T. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Joslin Diabetes Center (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Corresponding author
Unterman, Terry G.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2015-05-12
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
7079-7079
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1804718109
Cited by
228
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 7
FWCI
10.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2015-07-24)
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 BX001968, DK076169)
  • Yale University
  • Vanderbilt University (DK059637)
  • University of Michigan
  • University of Washington (DK‐035816)
  • National Research Foundation
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technology
  • Novo Nordisk
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-083042, DK068384, DK 035816, U24DK097153, DK-076169, DK101997, R01DK101997, R24DK097153, U24DK059637, DK 059637, U24DK076169, P01DK068384, DK-090320, R01DK033201, R00DK090210, R01DK090320, P30DK036836, P30DK035816, P30DK089503, R01DK083042)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › FOXO transcription factor regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
Keywords
FOXO1, insulin signaling, hepatic glucose production, hepatic glucose utilization, insulin resistance, glucose homeostasis, insulin receptor, 13C-glucose tracer, insulin clamp
MeSH terms
Forkhead Box Protein O1, Animals, Gene Expression Regulation, Gluconeogenesis, Glucose, Insulin, Liver, Male, Glucose Clamp Technique, Mice, Forkhead Transcription Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review