The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carrier separation and transport in perovskite solar cells studied by nanometre-scale profiling of electrical potential
Open accessAbstract
Organometal–halide perovskite solar cells have greatly improved in just a few years to a power conversion efficiency exceeding 20%. This technology shows unprecedented promise for terawatt-scale deployment of solar energy because of its low-cost, solution-based processing and earth-abundant materials. We have studied charge separation and transport in perovskite solar cells—which are the fundamental mechanisms of device operation and critical factors for power output—by determining the junction structure across the device using the nanoelectrical characterization technique of Kelvin probe force microscopy. The distribution of electrical potential across both planar and porous devices demonstrates p–n junction structure at the TiO2/perovskite interfaces and minority-carrier diffusion/drift operation of the devices, rather than the operation mechanism of either an excitonic cell or a p-i-n structure. Combining the potential profiling results with solar cell performance parameters measured on optimized and thickened devices, we find that carrier mobility is a main factor that needs to be improved for further gains in efficiency of the perovskite solar cells. Carrier separation and transport in solar cells need to be understood to improve efficiency. Here, Jianget al. study the junction structure in perovskite solar cells using Kelvin probe force microscopy, showing that solar cells have a p–n junction and carrier mobility is a limiting factor for device efficiency improvement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stranks, S. D., Eperon, G. E., Grancini, G., Menelaou, C., Alcocer, M. J. P., Leijtens, T., Herz, L. M., Petrozza, A., & Snaith, H. J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1243982 · Cited by 10,413
Solvent engineering for high-performance inorganic–organic hybrid perovskite solar cells
Jeon, N. J., Noh, J. H., Kim, Y. C., Yang, W. S., Ryu, S., & Seok, S. I. (2014) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4014 · Cited by 6,723
Cited by
Zheng, X., Li, Z., Zhang, Y., Chen, M., Liu, T., Xiao, C., Gao, D., Patel, J. B., Kuciauskas, D., Magomedov, A., et al. (2023) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-023-01227-6 · Cited by 359
Self-citationFrom Ultrafast to Ultraslow: Charge-Carrier Dynamics of Perovskite Solar Cells
Shi, J., Li, Y., Li, Y., Li, D., Luo, Y., Wu, H., & Meng, Q. (2018) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2018.04.010 · Cited by 341
Ionic Reactivity at Contacts and Aging of Methylammonium Lead Triiodide Perovskite Solar Cells
Carrillo, J., Guerrero, A., Rahimnejad, S., Almora, O., Zarazua, I., Mas‐Marza, E., Bisquert, J., & Garcia‐Belmonte, G. (2016) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201502246 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, C.-S., Yang, M., Zhou, Y., To, B., Nanayakkara, S. U., Luther, J. M., Zhou, W., Berry, J. J., van de Lagemaat, J., Padture, N. P., Zhu, K., & Al-Jassim, M. M.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2015-09-28
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 8397-8397
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2273321167
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.