The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trophic network architecture of root-associated bacterial communities determines pathogen invasion and plant health
Open accessAbstract
Host-associated bacterial communities can function as an important line of defence against pathogens in animals and plants. Empirical evidence and theoretical predictions suggest that species-rich communities are more resistant to pathogen invasions. Yet, the underlying mechanisms are unclear. Here, we experimentally test how the underlying resource competition networks of resident bacterial communities affect invasion resistance to the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum in microcosms and in tomato plant rhizosphere. We find that bipartite resource competition networks are better predictors of invasion resistance compared with resident community diversity. Specifically, communities with a combination of stabilizing configurations (low nestedness and high connectance), and a clear niche overlap with the pathogen, reduce pathogen invasion success, constrain pathogen growth within invaded communities and have lower levels of diseased plants in greenhouse experiments. Bacterial resource competition network characteristics can thus be important in explaining positive diversity–invasion resistance relationships in bacterial rhizosphere communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health
Berendsen, R. L., Pieterse, C. M. J., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2012) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001 · Cited by 5,347
Jousset, A., Schmid, B., Scheu, S., & Eisenhauer, N. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01613.x · Cited by 184
Self-citation
Cited by
Core microbiomes for sustainable agroecosystems
Toju, H., Peay, K. G., Yamamichi, M., Narisawa, K., Hiruma, K., Naito, K., Fukuda, S., Ushio, M., Nakaoka, S., Onoda, Y., et al. (2018) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-018-0139-4 · Cited by 1,077
Soil microbiomes and one health
Banerjee, S., & van der Heijden, M. G. A. (2023) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-022-00779-w · Cited by 905
The Plant Microbiota: Systems-Level Insights and Perspectives
Müller, D. B., Vogel, C., Bai, Y., & Vorholt, J. A. (2016) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-120215-034952 · Cited by 846
Understanding and exploiting plant beneficial microbes
Finkel, O. M., Castrillo, G., Herrera Paredes, S., Salas González, I., & Dangl, J. L. (2017) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2017.04.018 · Cited by 721
Oleńska, E., Małek, W., Wójcik, M., Swiecicka, I., Thijs, S., & Vangronsveld, J. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140682 · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Wei, Z., Yang, T., Friman, V.-P., Xu, Y., Shen, Q., & Jousset, A.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2015-09-24
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 8413-8413
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2259144512
- Cited by
- 596
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trophic network architecture of root-associated bacterial communities determines pathogen invasion and plant health. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ncomms9413
- The paper
- Wei, Z., Yang, T., Friman, V.-P., Xu, Y., Shen, Q., & Jousset, A. (2015). Trophic network architecture of root-associated bacterial communities determines pathogen invasion and plant health. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9413
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.