Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 660

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficient purification of ethene by an ethane-trapping metal-organic framework

Open access
Liao, Pei-Qin, Zhang, Wei-Xiong, Zhang, Jie-Peng, Chen, Xiao-Ming·2015·Nature Communications

Abstract

Separating ethene (C 2 H 4) from ethane (C 2 H 6) is of paramount importance and difficulty. Here we show that C 2 H 4 can be efficiently purified by trapping the inert C 2 H 6 in a judiciously designed metal-organic framework. Under ambient conditions, passing a typical cracked gas mixture (15:1 C 2 H 4/C 2 H 6) through 1 litre of this C 2 H 6 selective adsorbent directly produces 56 litres of C 2 H 4 with 99.95%+ purity (required by the C 2 H 4 polymerization reactor) at the outlet, with a single breakthrough operation, while other C 2 H 6 selective materials can only produce ca. ⩽ litre, and conventional C 2 H 4 selective adsorbents require at least four adsorption–desorption cycles to achieve the same C 2 H 4 purity. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction and computational simulation studies showed that the exceptional C 2 H 6 selectivity arises from the proper positioning of multiple electronegative and electropositive functional groups on the ultramicroporous pore surface, which form multiple C–H···N hydrogen bonds with C 2 H 6 instead of the more polar competitor C 2 H 4.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms9697

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 660

Metadata

Authors
Liao, P.-Q., Zhang, W.-X., Zhang, J.-P., & Chen, X.-M.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2015-10-29
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
8697-8697
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2263926059
Cited by
660
References
4
FWCI
13.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.