Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 649

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MYH9 is associated with nondiabetic end-stage renal disease in African Americans

Open access
on behalf of the Family Investigation of Nephropathy and Diabetes (FIND) Research Group, Kao, W H Linda, Klag, Michael J, Meoni, Lucy A, Reich, David, Berthier-Schaad, Yvette, Li, Man, Coresh, Josef, Patterson, Nick, Tandon, Arti, Powe, Neil R, Fink, Nancy E, Sadler, John H, Weir, Matthew R, Abboud, Hanna E, Adler, Sharon G, Divers, Jasmin, Iyengar, Sudha K, Freedman, Barry I, Kimmel, Paul L, Knowler, William C, Kohn, Orly F, Kramp, Kristopher, Leehey, David J, Nicholas, Susanne B, Pahl, Madeleine V, Schelling, Jeffrey R, Sedor, John R, Thornley-Brown, Denyse, Winkler, Cheryl A, Smith, Michael W, Parekh, Rulan S·2008·Nature Genetics

Abstract

As end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has a four times higher incidence in African Americans compared to European Americans, we hypothesized that susceptibility alleles for ESRD have a higher frequency in the West African than the European gene pool. We carried out a genome-wide admixture scan in 1,372 ESRD cases and 806 controls and found a highly significant association between excess African ancestry and nondiabetic ESRD (lod score = 5.70) but not diabetic ESRD (lod = 0.47) on chromosome 22q12. Each copy of the European ancestral allele conferred a relative risk of 0.50 (95% CI = 0.39–0.63) compared to African ancestry. Multiple common SNPs (allele frequencies ranging from 0.2 to 0.6) in the gene encoding nonmuscle myosin heavy chain type II isoform A (MYH9) were associated with two to four times greater risk of nondiabetic ESRD and accounted for a large proportion of the excess risk of ESRD observed in African compared to European Americans.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.232

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 649

Metadata

Authors
on behalf of the Family Investigation of Nephropathy and Diabetes (FIND) Research Group, Kao, W. H. L., Klag, M. J., Meoni, L. A., Reich, D., Berthier-Schaad, Y., Li, M., Coresh, J., Patterson, N., Tandon, A., Powe, N. R., Fink, N. E., Sadler, J. H., Weir, M. R., Abboud, H. E., Adler, S. G., Divers, J., Iyengar, S. K., Freedman, B. I., Kimmel, P. L., Knowler, W. C., Kohn, O. F., Kramp, K., Leehey, D. J., Nicholas, S. B., Pahl, M. V., Schelling, J. R., Sedor, J. R., Thornley-Brown, D., Winkler, C. A., Smith, M. W., & Parekh, R. S.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2008-09-14
Volume
40
Issue
10
Pages
1185-1192
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2160180886
Cited by
649
References
1
FWCI
40.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.