Cited by 832Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesGene Regulatory Network Analysis

Understanding multicellular function and disease with human tissue-specific networks

Open access
Greene, Casey S, Krishnan, Arjun, Wong, Aaron K, Ricciotti, Emanuela, Zelaya, Rene A, Himmelstein, Daniel S, Zhang, Ran, Hartmann, Boris M +7 more·2015·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Tissue and cell-type identity lie at the core of human physiology and disease. Understanding the genetic underpinnings of complex tissues and individual cell lineages is crucial for developing improved diagnostics and therapeutics. We present genome-wide functional interaction networks for 144 human tissues and cell types developed using a data-driven Bayesian methodology that integrates thousands of diverse experiments spanning tissue and disease states. Tissue-specific networks predict lineage-specific responses to perturbation, identify the changing functional roles of genes across tissues and illuminate relationships among diseases. We introduce NetWAS, which combines genes with nominally significant genome-wide association study (GWAS) P values and tissue-specific networks to identify disease-gene associations more accurately than GWAS alone. Our webserver, GIANT, provides an interface to human tissue networks through multi-gene queries, network visualization, analysis tools including NetWAS and downloadable networks. GIANT enables systematic exploration of the landscape of interacting genes that shape specialized cellular functions across more than a hundred human tissues and cell types.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.3259

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If multiple GWAS hits exist in the same module, their cumulative presence can significantly contribute to disease development.

    “If multiple Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) hits exist in the same module, their cumulative presence can significantly contribute to disease development [120, 163, 164].”

    From Gene co-expression analysis for functional classification and gene–disease predictions (2017) · cites this paper as [120]

    The Results section, “Tissue networks are tools for data-driven analysis of GWAS” (page unavailable), says NetWAS uses top GWAS hits to identify network connectivity patterns associated with a phenotype. It does not establish that multiple hits in the same module cumulatively contribute to disease development; it uses their network relationships to prioritize candidate disease genes. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • LAMP1, GRSF1, and one other protein are in a brain tissue-specific genetic interaction neighborhood that is highly enriched for the lysosome KEGG pathway.

    “Of note, these latter 3 proteins are in a brain tissue-specific genetic interaction neighborhood (Greene et al., 2015) that is highly significantly (FDR-corrected p<1×10−7) enriched for the lysosome KEGG pathway.”
  • The key advance of the NetWAS 2.0 method is that it leverages GWAS p-values as opposed to treating all non-significant genes as having equal probability of being negative examples as in the original NetWAS method.

    “Intuitively, the key advance of the NetWAS 2.0 method is that it leverages the GWAS p-values as opposed to treating all non-significant genes as having equal probability of being negative examples as in the original NetWAS method (Greene et al., 2015).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 93 · Cited by 832

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [46]46. Winter EE Goodstadt L Ponting CP Elevated rates of protein secretion, evolution, and disease among tissue-specific genes Genome Res 14 54 61 2004 14707169 10.1101/gr.1924004 PMC314278 · DOI
  2. [62]62. Cai JJ Petrov DA Relaxed purifying selection and possibly high rate of adaptation in primate lineage-specific genes Genome Biol Evol 2 393 409 2010 20624743 10.1093/gbe/evq019 PMC2997544 · DOI
  3. [63]63. Winter EE Goodstadt L Ponting CP Elevated rates of protein secretion, evolution, and disease among tissue-specific genes Genome Res 14 54 61 2004 14707169 10.1101/gr.1924004 PMC314278 · DOI
  4. [81]81. [14] Park CY Functional knowledge transfer for high-accuracy prediction of understudied biological processes PLoS Comput Biol 9 e1002957 2013 23516347 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002957 PMC3597527 · DOI
  5. [82]82. [15] Keshava Prasad TS Human Protein Reference Database--2009 update Nucleic Acids Res 37 D767 72 2009 18988627 10.1093/nar/gkn892 PMC2686490 · DOI
  6. [83]83. [16] Gremse M The BRENDA Tissue Ontology (BTO): the first all-integrating ontology of all organisms for enzyme sources Nucleic Acids Res 39 D507 13 2011 21030441 10.1093/nar/gkq968 PMC3013802 · DOI
  7. [94]94. [27] Huttenhower C Exploring the human genome with functional maps Genome Res 19 1093 106 2009 19246570 10.1101/gr.082214.108 PMC2694471 · DOI
  8. [95]95. [28] Guyton AC Blood pressure control--special role of the kidneys and body fluids Science (80-) 252 1813 1816 1991 10.1126/science.2063193 2063193 · DOI
  9. [96]96. [29] Ridker PM Rationale, design, and methodology of the Women’s Genome Health Study: a genome-wide association study of more than 25,000 initially healthy american women Clin Chem 54 249 55 2008 18070814 10.1373/clinchem.2007.099366 · DOI
  10. [97]97. [30] Liu JZ A versatile gene-based test for genome-wide association studies Am J Hum Genet 87 139 45 2010 20598278 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.06.009 PMC2896770 · DOI

Authors
Greene, C. S., Krishnan, A., Wong, A. K., Ricciotti, E., Zelaya, R. A., Himmelstein, D. S., Zhang, R., Hartmann, B. M., Zaslavsky, E., Sealfon, S. C., Chasman, D. I., FitzGerald, G. A., Dolinski, K., Grosser, T., & Troyanskaya, O. G.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Troyanskaya, Olga G
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2015-04-27
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
569-576
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W1981409633
Cited by
832
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 110 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 72 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 1
FWCI
34.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R24OD011194)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (HHSN272201000054C)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U54HL117798)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG005998, T32HG003284)
  • National Cancer Institute (T32CA009528)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM071966, P20GM103534, P50GM071508)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (HHSN272201000054C, U19AI117873)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30ES013508)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
gene-disease association, Bayesian network inference, genome-wide association study, cell lineage, disease relationships, network visualization
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Bayes Theorem, Cells, Cultured, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Hypertension, Models, Biological, Organ Specificity, Parkinson Disease, Myocytes, Smooth Muscle, Gene Regulatory Networks, Genome-Wide Association Study, Protein Interaction Maps, Gene Ontology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review