Mitochondrial DNA sequence heteroplasmy in the Grand Duke of Russia Georgij Romanov establishes the authenticity of the remains of Tsar Nicholas II
Abstract
In 1991, nine sets of skeletal remains were excavated from a mass grave near Yekaterinburg, Russia which were believed to include the Russian Tsar Nicholas II, the Tsarina Alexandra, and three of their daughters. Nuclear DNA testing of the remains verified such a family group, and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences of the presumed Tsarina matched a known maternal relative, Prince Philip. mtDNA sequences from bone of the presumed Tsar matched two living maternal relatives except at a single position, where the bone sample had a mixture of matching (T) and mismatching (C) bases. Cloning experiments indicated that this mixture was due to heteroplasmy within the Tsar; nevertheless, the 'mismatch' fueled a lingering controversy concerning the authenticity of these remains. As a result, the official final report on the fate of the last Russian Royals has been postponed by Russian authorities pending additional, convincing DNA evidence. At the request of the Russian Federation government, we analysed the skeletal remains of the Tsar's brother Georgij Romanov in order to gain further insight into the occurrence and segregation of heteroplasmic mtDNA variants in the Tsar's maternal lineage. The mtDNA sequence of Georgij Romanov, matched that of the putative Tsar, and was heteroplasmic at the same position. This confirms heteroplasmy in the Tsar's lineage, and is powerful evidence supporting the identification of Tsar Nicholas II. The rapid intergenerational shift from heteroplasmy to homoplasmy, and the different heteroplasmic ratios in the brothers, is consistent with a 'bottleneck' mechanism of mtDNA segregation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The full control region sequence from Tsar Nicholas II matched published HVI and HVII data: 16126C, 16169Y, 16294T, 16296T, 16519C, 73G, 263G, 315.1C.
“The sequence of the full control region [16024-576] was also determined from the remains of Tsar Nicholas II (a tooth from skeleton #4) and matched the published data of HVI and HVII from Gill et al. [3] and Ivanov et al. [4]: 16126C, 16169Y, 16294T, 16296T, 16519C, 73G, 263G, 315.1C with the transition at position 16519 newly characterized in the control region.”
From Mystery Solved: The Identification of the Two Missing Romanov Children Using DNA Analysis (2009) · cites this paper as [4]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mystery Solved: The Identification of the Two Missing Romanov Children Using DNA Analysis
Coble, M. D., Loreille, O. M., Wadhams, M. J., Edson, S. M., Maynard, K., Meyer, C. E., Niederstätter, H., Berger, C., Berger, B., Falsetti, A. B., et al. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004838 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Self-citationLate Quaternary loss of genetic diversity in muskox (Ovibos)
MacPhee, R. D., Tikhonov, A. N., Mol, D., & Greenwood, A. D. (2005) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-5-49 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Mikkelsen, M., Frank-Hansen, R., Hansen, A. J., & Morling, N. (2014) · Forensic Science International: Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.03.014 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
The identification of the Romanovs: Can we (finally) put the controversies to rest?
Coble, M. D. (2011) · Investigative Genetics · doi:10.1186/2041-2223-2-20 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“[13] evaluated the evidence in their investigations using a Bayesian approach to evaluate the weight of the evidence under two opposing hypotheses (likelihood ratio): (1) These are the remains of the Romanovs, and (2) these are not the remains of the Romanovs.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe execution of the Romanov family at Yekatarinberg
Byard, R. W. (2020) · Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology · doi:10.1007/s12024-020-00218-3 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ivanov, P. L., Wadhams, M. J., Roby, R. K., Holland, M. M., Weedn, V. W., & Parsons, T. J.
- Affiliations
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology (RU)
- Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (US)
- Venue
- Nature Genetics
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 417-420
- ISSN
- 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1718
- OpenAlex
- W2024085208
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 10.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Keywords
- mitochondrial heteroplasmy, Nicholas II, skeletal identification, homoplasmy, maternal lineage
- MeSH terms
- Base Sequence, DNA, Mitochondrial, Family, Famous Persons, Female, Humans, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Pedigree, Russia (Pre-1917), Point Mutation, DNA Primers, Forensic Anthropology, History, 19th Century, History, 20th Century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review