Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 768

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative genomic analysis of three Leishmania species that cause diverse human disease

Open access
Peacock, Christopher S, Seeger, Kathy, Harris, David, Murphy, Lee, Ruiz, Jeronimo C, Quail, Michael A, Peters, Nick, Adlem, Ellen, Tivey, Adrian, Aslett, Martin, Kerhornou, Arnaud, Ivens, Alasdair, Fraser, Audrey, Rajandream, Marie-Adele, Carver, Tim, Norbertczak, Halina, Chillingworth, Tracey, Hance, Zahra, Jagels, Kay, Moule, Sharon, Ormond, Doug, Rutter, Simon, Squares, Rob, Whitehead, Sally, Rabbinowitsch, Ester, Arrowsmith, Claire, White, Brian, Thurston, Scott, Bringaud, Frédéric, Baldauf, Sandra L, Faulconbridge, Adam, Jeffares, Daniel, Depledge, Daniel P, Oyola, Samuel O, Hilley, James D, Brito, Loislene O, Tosi, Luiz R O, Barrell, Barclay, Cruz, Angela K, Mottram, Jeremy C, Smith, Deborah F, Berriman, Matthew·2007·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Leishmania parasites cause a broad spectrum of clinical disease. Here we report the sequencing of the genomes of two species of Leishmania: Leishmania infantum and Leishmania braziliensis. The comparison of these sequences with the published genome of Leishmania major reveals marked conservation of synteny and identifies only ∼200 genes with a differential distribution between the three species. L. braziliensis, contrary to Leishmania species examined so far, possesses components of a putative RNA-mediated interference pathway, telomere-associated transposable elements and spliced leader–associated SLACS retrotransposons. We show that pseudogene formation and gene loss are the principal forces shaping the different genomes. Genes that are differentially distributed between the species encode proteins implicated in host-pathogen interactions and parasite survival in the macrophage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng2053

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 768

Metadata

Authors
Peacock, C. S., Seeger, K., Harris, D., Murphy, L., Ruiz, J. C., Quail, M. A., Peters, N., Adlem, E., Tivey, A., Aslett, M., Kerhornou, A., Ivens, A., Fraser, A., Rajandream, M.-A., Carver, T., Norbertczak, H., Chillingworth, T., Hance, Z., Jagels, K., Moule, S., Ormond, D., Rutter, S., Squares, R., Whitehead, S., Rabbinowitsch, E., Arrowsmith, C., White, B., Thurston, S., Bringaud, F., Baldauf, S. L., Faulconbridge, A., Jeffares, D., Depledge, D. P., Oyola, S. O., Hilley, J. D., Brito, L. O., Tosi, L. R. O., Barrell, B., Cruz, A. K., Mottram, J. C., Smith, D. F., & Berriman, M.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2007-06-17
Volume
39
Issue
7
Pages
839-847
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2170302951
Cited by
768
References
1
FWCI
50.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative genomic analysis of three Leishmania species that cause diverse human disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ng2053
The paper
Peacock, C. S., Seeger, K., Harris, D., Murphy, L., Ruiz, J. C., Quail, M. A., Peters, N., Adlem, E., Tivey, A., Aslett, M., Kerhornou, A., Ivens, A., Fraser, A., Rajandream, M.-A., Carver, T., Norbertczak, H., Chillingworth, T., Hance, Z., Jagels, K., . . . Berriman, M. (2007). Comparative genomic analysis of three Leishmania species that cause diverse human disease. Nature Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng2053

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.