Cited by 290Chemokine receptors and signalingLymphatic System and DiseasesImmune Response and Inflammation

The atypical chemokine receptor CCRL1 shapes functional CCL21 gradients in lymph nodes

Ulvmar, Maria H, Werth, Kathrin, Braun, Asolina, Kelay, Poonam, Hub, Elin, Eller, Kathrin, Chan, Li, Lucas, Beth +7 more·2014·Nature Immunology

Abstract

Afferent lymph-borne dendritic cells essentially rely on the chemokine receptor CCR7 for their transition from the subcapsular lymph node sinus into the parenchyma, a migratory step driven by putative gradients of CCR7 ligands. We found that lymph node fringes indeed contained physiological gradients of the chemokine CCL21, which depended on the expression of CCRL1, the atypical receptor for the CCR7 ligands CCL19 and CCL21. Lymphatic endothelial cells lining the ceiling of the subcapsular sinus, but not those lining the floor, expressed CCRL1, which scavenged chemokines from the sinus lumen. This created chemokine gradients across the sinus floor and enabled the emigration of dendritic cells. In vitro live imaging revealed that spatially confined expression of CCRL1 was necessary and sufficient for the creation of functional chemokine gradients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ni.2889

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CCL21 gradients that drive DC and activated T cell entry into the lymph node from the SCS are reinforced by ACKR4 expressed by ceiling SCS LECs.

    “Similar to the entry of DCs and T cells into initial LVs, CCL21 gradients that drive DC and activated T cell entry into the lymph node from the SCS are reinforced by ACKR4, which is expressed by ceiling SCS LECs (121).”

    From Transport and Immune Functions of the Lymphatic System. (2025) · cites this paper as [121]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ulvmar, M. H., Werth, K., Braun, A., Kelay, P., Hub, E., Eller, K., Chan, L., Lucas, B., Novitzky-Basso, I., Nakamura, K., Rülicke, T., Nibbs, R. J. B., Worbs, T., Förster, R., & Rot, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
  • Medical University of Graz (AT)
  • University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (AT)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Förster, Reinhold
  • Rot, Antal
Venue
Nature Immunology
Published
2014-05-11
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
623-630
ISSN
  • 1529-2908 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2916
OpenAlex
W2048378882
Cited by
290
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 8
FWCI
11.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (WT090962MA)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Chemokine receptors and signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lymphatic System and Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
Keywords
CCL21, chemokine gradients, lymph nodes, CCR7, subcapsular sinus, lymphatic endothelial cells, chemokine scavenging, afferent lymph, lymphocyte homing, CCL19
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Movement, Dendritic Cells, Lymph Nodes, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Receptors, CCR, Chemokine CCL21

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review