Cited by 179Cancer-related molecular mechanisms researchT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Long non-coding RNA profiling of human lymphoid progenitor cells reveals transcriptional divergence of B cell and T cell lineages

Open access
Casero, David, Sandoval, Salemiz, Seet, Christopher S, Scholes, Jessica, Zhu, Yuhua, Ha, Vi Luan, Luong, Annie, Parekh, Chintan +1 more·2015·Nature Immunology

Abstract

To elucidate the transcriptional 'landscape' that regulates human lymphoid commitment during postnatal life, we used RNA sequencing to assemble the long non-coding transcriptome across human bone marrow and thymic progenitor cells spanning the earliest stages of B lymphoid and T lymphoid specification. Over 3,000 genes encoding previously unknown long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) were revealed through the analysis of these rare populations. Lymphoid commitment was characterized by lncRNA expression patterns that were highly stage specific and were more lineage specific than those of protein-coding genes. Protein-coding genes co-expressed with neighboring lncRNA genes showed enrichment for ontologies related to lymphoid differentiation. The exquisite cell-type specificity of global lncRNA expression patterns independently revealed new developmental relationships among the earliest progenitor cells in the human bone marrow and thymus.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ni.3299

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PU.1 expression timing relative to other developmentally regulated transcription factors is conserved between human and mouse.

    “This expression timing relative to other developmentally regulated transcription factors is conserved between human and mouse (35, 36)”

    From Mechanisms of Action of Hematopoietic Transcription Factor PU.1 in Initiation of T-Cell Development (2019) · cites this paper as [35]

    The Discussion describes a transcriptional map of human lymphoid progenitors but does not compare the timing of PU.1 expression in humans and mice. Searches for PU.1, SPI1, and conserved expression timing found no passage in our copy addressing that comparison. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The developmental expression patterns of these genes and PU.1 (Spi1) in human pro-T cells (Thy1-Thy4) are similar to their patterns in murine pro-T cells.

    “Consistent with an evolutionarily conserved program in regulating these genes, the developmental expression patterns of these genes and PU.1 (Spi1) in human pro-T cells (Thy1—Thy4) are similar to their patterns in murine pro-T cells (35).”

    From Mechanisms of Action of Hematopoietic Transcription Factor PU.1 in Initiation of T-Cell Development (2019) · cites this paper as [35]

    The Results section on co-expression modules describes expression across human Thy1–Thy4 populations, but does not compare their developmental patterns with murine pro-T cells. Searches for PU.1/SPI1 and cross-species thymic expression found no passage in our copy establishing the claimed similarity (page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. [1]Fatica A Bozzoni I Long non-coding RNAs: new players in cell differentiation and development Nat Rev Genet 2014 15 7 21 24296535
  2. [2]Galy A Travis M Cen D Chen B Human TB natural killer, and dendritic cells arise from a common bone marrow progenitor cell subset Immunity 1995 3 459 473 7584137
  3. [3]Plum J Human intrathymic development: a selective approach Semin Immunopathol 2008 30 411 423 18925396
  4. [4]Doulatov S Revised map of the human progenitor hierarchy shows the origin of macrophages and dendritic cells in early lymphoid development Nat Immunol 2010 11 585 593 20543838
  5. [5]Six EM A human postnatal lymphoid progenitor capable of circulating and seeding the thymus J Exp Med 2007 204 3085 3093 18070935 PMC2150974
  6. [6]Kohn LA Lymphoid priming in human bone marrow begins before expression of CD10 with upregulation of L-selectin Nat Immunol 2012 13 963 971 22941246 PMC3448017
  7. [7]Blom B Spits H Development of human lymphoid cells Annu Rev Immunol 2006 24 287 320 16551251
  8. [8]Hao QL Human intrathymic lineage commitment is marked by differential CD7 expression: identification of CD7- lympho-myeloid thymic progenitors Blood 2008 111 1318 1326 17959857 PMC2214748
  9. [9]Weerkamp F Human thymus contains multipotent progenitors with T/B lymphoid, myeloid, and erythroid lineage potential Blood 2006 107 3131 3137 16384926
  10. [11]Dik WA New insights on human T cell development by quantitative T cell receptor gene rearrangement studies and gene expression profiling J Exp Med 2005 201 1715 1723 15928199 PMC2213269
  11. [12]Tydell CC Molecular dissection of prethymic progenitor entry into the T lymphocyte developmental pathway J Immunol 2007 179 421 438 17579063
  12. [13]Wang L CPAT: Coding-Potential Assessment Tool using an alignment-free logistic regression model Nucleic Acids Res 2013 41 e74 23335781 PMC3616698
  13. [14]Lin MF Jungreis I Kellis M PhyloCSF: a comparative genomics method to distinguish protein coding and non-coding regions Bioinformatics 2011 27 i275 i282 21685081 PMC3117341
  14. [15]Derrien T The GENCODE v7 catalog of human long noncoding RNAs: analysis of their gene structure, evolution, and expression Genome Res 2012 22 1775 1789 22955988 PMC3431493
  15. [16]Volders PJ LNCipedia: a database for annotated human lncRNA transcript sequences and structures Nucleic Acids Res 2013 41 D246 D251 23042674 PMC3531107
  16. [17]Trimarchi T Genome-wide Mapping and Characterization of Notch-Regulated Long Noncoding RNAs in Acute Leukemia Cell 2014 158 593 606 25083870 PMC4131209
  17. [18]Marques AC Chromatin signatures at transcriptional start sites separate two equally populated yet distinct classes of intergenic long noncoding RNAs Genome Biol 2013 14 R131 24289259 PMC4054604
  18. [19]NE II Long non-coding RNAs and enhancer RNAs regulate the lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory response in human monocytes Nat Commun 2014 5 3979 24909122 PMC4061460
  19. [21]Chadwick LH The NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Program data resource Epigenomics 2012 4 317 324 22690667 PMC3381455
  20. [22]Sati S Ghosh S Jain V Scaria V Sengupta S Genome-wide analysis reveals distinct patterns of epigenetic features in long non-coding RNA loci Nucleic Acids Res 2012 40 10018 10031 22923516 PMC3488231
  21. [23]Si Y Liu P Li P Brutnell TP Model-based clustering for RNA-Seq data Bioinformatics 2014 30 197 205 24191069
  22. [25]Chen L Transcriptional diversity during lineage commitment of human blood progenitors Science 2014 345 1251033 25258084 PMC4254742
  23. [26]Rinn JL Chang HY Genome regulation by long noncoding RNAs Annu Rev Biochem 2012 81 145 166 22663078 PMC3858397
  24. [27]Langfelder P Horvath S WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis BMC Bioinformatics 2008 9 559 19114008 PMC2631488
  25. [28]Horvath S Analysis of oncogenic signaling networks in glioblastoma identifies ASPM as a molecular target Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006 103 17402 17407 17090670 PMC1635024
  26. [29]Taghon T Notch signaling is required for proliferation but not for differentiation at a well-defined beta-selection checkpoint during human T-cell development Blood 2009 113 3254 3263 18948571
  27. [31]Ranzani V The long intergenic noncoding RNA landscape of human lymphocytes highlights the regulation of T cell differentiation by linc-MAF-4 Nat Immunol 2015 16 318 325 25621826 PMC4333215
  28. [32]Durinck K The Notch driven long non-coding RNA repertoire in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia Hematologica 2014 PMC4258754 25344525
  29. [33]Dobin A STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner Bioinformatics 2013 29 15 21 23104886 PMC3530905
  30. [34]Roberts A Pimentel H Trapnell C Pachter L Identification of novel transcripts in annotated genomes using RNA-Seq Bioinformatics 2011 27 2325 2329 21697122
  31. [35]Anders S Pyl PT Huber W HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data Bioinformatics 2015 31 166 169 25260700 PMC4287950
  32. [36]Anders S Huber W Differential expression analysis for sequence count data Genome Biol 2010 11 R106 20979621 PMC3218662
  33. [37]Zhang Y Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) Genome Biol 2008 9 R137 18798982 PMC2592715
  34. [38]Heinz S Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities Mol Cell 2010 38 576 589 20513432 PMC2898526

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Casero, D., Sandoval, S., Seet, C. S., Scholes, J., Zhu, Y., Ha, V. L., Luong, A., Parekh, C., & Crooks, G. M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Children's Hospital Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
  • Parekh, Chintan
  • Crooks, Gay M
Venue
Nature Immunology
Published
2015-12
Volume
16
Issue
12
Pages
1282-1291
ISSN
  • 1529-2908 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2916
OpenAlex
W2206207244
Cited by
179
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 16
FWCI
7.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (4k12hd034610-20)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL086345, P01HL073104, T32HL066992)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI-28 697, P30AI028697)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K12 HD-034610, K12HD052954)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
long non-coding RNA, lymphoid progenitor cells, T cell lineage specification, lymphoid differentiation, bone marrow, thymus, lncRNA transcriptome, cell type-specific gene expression, transcriptional regulation
MeSH terms
B-Lymphocytes, Bayes Theorem, Bone Marrow Cells, Humans, T-Lymphocytes, Thymus Gland, Cluster Analysis, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Cell Lineage, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Lymphoid Progenitor Cells, Transcriptome, RNA, Long Noncoding, Gene Ontology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review