Cited by 296Tissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicinePediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and TreatmentsLiver physiology and pathology

Reconstruction of the mouse extrahepatic biliary tree using primary human extrahepatic cholangiocyte organoids

Open access
Sampaziotis, Fotios, Justin, Alexander W, Tysoe, Olivia C, Sawiak, Stephen, Godfrey, Edmund M, Upponi, Sara S, Gieseck, Richard L, de Brito, Miguel Cardoso +35 more·2017·Nature Medicine

Abstract

The treatment of common bile duct (CBD) disorders, such as biliary atresia or ischemic strictures, is restricted by the lack of biliary tissue from healthy donors suitable for surgical reconstruction. Here we report a new method for the isolation and propagation of human cholangiocytes from the extrahepatic biliary tree in the form of extrahepatic cholangiocyte organoids (ECOs) for regenerative medicine applications. The resulting ECOs closely resemble primary cholangiocytes in terms of their transcriptomic profile and functional properties. We explore the regenerative potential of these organoids in vivo and demonstrate that ECOs self-organize into bile duct-like tubes expressing biliary markers following transplantation under the kidney capsule of immunocompromised mice. In addition, when seeded on biodegradable scaffolds, ECOs form tissue-like structures retaining biliary characteristics. The resulting bioengineered tissue can reconstruct the gallbladder wall and repair the biliary epithelium following transplantation into a mouse model of injury. Furthermore, bioengineered artificial ducts can replace the native CBD, with no evidence of cholestasis or occlusion of the lumen. In conclusion, ECOs can successfully reconstruct the biliary tree, providing proof of principle for organ regeneration using human primary cholangiocytes expanded in vitro.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nm.4360

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 296

Authors
Sampaziotis, F., Justin, A. W., Tysoe, O. C., Sawiak, S., Godfrey, E. M., Upponi, S. S., Gieseck, R. L., de Brito, M. C., Berntsen, N. L., Gómez-Vázquez, M. J., Ortmann, D., Yiangou, L., Ross, A., Bargehr, J., Bertero, A., Zonneveld, M. C. F., Pedersen, M. T., Pawlowski, M., Valestrand, L., Madrigal, P., Georgakopoulos, N., Pirmadjid, N., Skeldon, G. M., Casey, J., Shu, W., Materek, P. M., Snijders, K. E., Brown, S. E., Rimland, C. A., Simonic, I., Davies, S. E., Jensen, K. B., Zilbauer, M., Gelson, W. T. H., Alexander, G. J., Sinha, S., Hannan, N. R. F., Wynn, T. A., Karlsen, T. H., Melum, E., Markaki, A. E., Saeb-Parsy, K., & Vallier, L.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • University of Strathclyde (GB)
  • Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Vallier, Ludovic
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2017-07-03
Volume
23
Issue
8
Pages
954-963
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W2706066070
Cited by
296
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 10
FWCI
26.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (acceptedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • British Heart Foundation (FS/13/65/30441, FS/13/29/30024)
  • Sparks (14CAM01)
  • Evelyn Trust
  • National Institutes of Health (IA 52242)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_PC_12009, MR/L016761/1)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/L504920/1, 1353455, EP/M506837/1)
  • NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
Keywords
biliary atresia, regenerative medicine, kidney capsule transplantation, biodegradable scaffolds, cholestasis
MeSH terms
Animals, Biliary Tract, Epithelial Cells, Gallbladder, gamma-Glutamyltransferase, Humans, Organoids, Regeneration, Secretin, Somatostatin, Cell Transplantation, Bile Ducts, Extrahepatic, Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator, Tissue Engineering, Mice, Keratin-19, Keratin-7, Tissue Scaffolds, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review