Alternatively spliced mdm2 transcripts with loss of p53 binding domain sequences: Transforming ability and frequent detection in human cancer
Open accessAbstract
The mdm2 oncogene encodes a 90-kilodalton nuclear phosphoprotein that binds and inactivates the p53 tumor suppressor protein. Here we report the observation of five alternatively spliced mdm2 gene transcripts in a range of human cancers and their absence in normal tissues. Transfection of NIH 3T3 cells with each of these forms gave foci of morphologically transformed cells. A higher frequency of splice variants lacking p53 binding domain sequences was found in late-stage and high-grade ovarian and bladder carcinomas. Four of the splice variants show loss of p53 binding, consistent with partial deletion of sequences encoding the p53 binding domain, but retain carboxyterminal zinc-finger domains. These observations suggest a reassessment of the transforming mechanisms of mdm2 and its relation to p53.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mdm2 splice variants lacking the p53 binding domain identified in tumors promote transformation in vitro despite their lack of p53 association.
“Mdm2 splice variants lacking the p53 binding domain identified in tumors promote transformation in vitro despite their lack of p53 association (42).”
From Mdm2 Promotes Genetic Instability and Transformation Independent of p53 (2008) · cites this paper as [42]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 268
- Authors
- Sigalas, I., Calvert, A. H., Anderson, J. J., Neal, D. E., & Lunec, J.
- Affiliations
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Venue
- Nature Medicine
- Published
- 1996-08
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 912-917
- ISSN
- 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-170X
- OpenAlex
- W2003925068
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 7.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
- Keywords
- MDM2, alternative splicing, splice variants, p53-binding domain, p53 inactivation, oncogenes, cell transformation, ovarian carcinoma, bladder cancer, zinc finger, tumor suppressor
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Base Sequence, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Female, Humans, Leukemia, Molecular Sequence Data, Neoplasm Proteins, Nuclear Proteins, Ovarian Neoplasms, Protein Binding, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, RNA, Transformation, Genetic, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, 3T3 Cells, Alternative Splicing, DNA Primers, Disease Progression, Mice, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review