Tuning the erosion rate of artificial protein hydrogels through control of network topology
Abstract
Erosion behaviour governs the use of physical hydrogels in biomedical applications ranging from controlled release to cell encapsulation. Genetically engineered protein hydrogels offer unique means of controlling the erosion rate by engineering their amino acid sequences and network topology. Here, we show that the erosion rate of such materials can be tuned by harnessing selective molecular recognition, discrete aggregation number and orientational discrimination of coiled-coil protein domains. Hydrogels formed from a triblock artificial protein bearing dissimilar helical coiled-coil end domains (P and A) erode more than one hundredfold slower than hydrogels formed from those bearing the same end domains (either P or A). The reduced erosion rate is a consequence of the fact that looped chains are suppressed because P and A tend not to associate with each other. Thus, the erosion rate can be tuned over several orders of magnitude in artificial protein hydrogels, opening the door to diverse biomedical applications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recombinant proteins can be programmed to degrade and remodel at controlled rates by including protease recognition sites or changing crosslinking chemistry.
“They can be programmed to degrade and remodel at controlled rates by including protease recognition sites206 or changing crosslinking chemistry207.”
From Towards organoid culture without Matrigel (2021) · cites this paper as [207]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 294
- Authors
- Shen, W., Zhang, K., Kornfield, J. A., & Tirrell, D. A.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shen, Wei
- Zhang, Kechun
- Kornfield, Julia A.
- Tirrell, David A.
- Venue
- Nature Materials
- Published
- 2006-01-29
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 153-158
- ISSN
- 1476-1122 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4660
- OpenAlex
- W2089653670
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 8.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nature Materials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
- Keywords
- network topology, coiled-coil domain, aggregation number, controlled release, cell encapsulation, physical hydrogels
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Biocompatible Materials, Models, Molecular, Proteins, Hydrogels
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review