The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current-induced transition from particle-by-particle to concurrent intercalation in phase-separating battery electrodes
Abstract
Many battery electrodes contain ensembles of nanoparticles that phase-separate on (de)intercalation. In such electrodes, the fraction of actively intercalating particles directly impacts cycle life: a vanishing population concentrates the current in a small number of particles, leading to current hotspots. Reports of the active particle population in the phase-separating electrode lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4; LFP) vary widely, ranging from near 0% (particle-by-particle) to 100% (concurrent intercalation). Using synchrotron-based X-ray microscopy, we probed the individual state-of-charge for over 3,000 LFP particles. We observed that the active population depends strongly on the cycling current, exhibiting particle-by-particle-like behaviour at low rates and increasingly concurrent behaviour at high rates, consistent with our phase-field porous electrode simulations. Contrary to intuition, the current density, or current per active internal surface area, is nearly invariant with the global electrode cycling rate. Rather, the electrode accommodates higher current by increasing the active particle population. This behaviour results from thermodynamic transformation barriers in LFP, and such a phenomenon probably extends to other phase-separating battery materials. We propose that modifying the transformation barrier and exchange current density can increase the active population and thus the current homogeneity. This could introduce new paradigms to enhance the cycle life of phase-separating battery electrodes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stress generation and fracture in lithium insertion materials
Christensen, J., & Newman, J. (2006) · Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10008-006-0095-1 · Cited by 727
Cited by
Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries
Lin, D., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.16 · Cited by 6,763
Origin of Reversible Photoinduced Phase Separation in Hybrid Perovskites
Bischak, C. G., Hetherington, C. L., Wu, H., Aloni, S., Ogletree, D. F., Limmer, D. T., & Ginsberg, N. S. (2017) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04453 · Cited by 745
Zhao, J., Lu, Z., Wang, H., Liu, W., Lee, H.-W., Yan, K., Zhuo, D., Lin, D., Liu, N., & Cui, Y. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b04526 · Cited by 369
Lithium Extraction from Seawater through Pulsed Electrochemical Intercalation
Liu, C., Li, Y., Lin, D., Hsu, P.-C., Liu, B., Yan, G., Wu, T., Cui, Y., & Chu, S. (2020) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2020.05.017 · Cited by 365
Self-citationNanoscale Phenomena in Lithium-Ion Batteries
Jung, S.-K., Hwang, I., Chang, D., Park, K.-Y., Kim, S. J., Seong, W. M., Eum, D., Park, J., Kim, B., Kim, J., et al. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00405 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Y., El Gabaly, F., Ferguson, T. R., Smith, R. B., Bartelt, N. C., Sugar, J. D., Fenton, K. R., Cogswell, D. A., Kilcoyne, A. L. D., Tyliszczak, T., Bazant, M. Z., & Chueh, W. C.
- Venue
- Nature Materials
- Published
- 2014-09-14
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1149-1156
- ISSN
- 1476-1122 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4660
- OpenAlex
- W2084080017
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current-induced transition from particle-by-particle to concurrent intercalation in phase-separating battery electrodes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nmat4084
- The paper
- Li, Y., El Gabaly, F., Ferguson, T. R., Smith, R. B., Bartelt, N. C., Sugar, J. D., Fenton, K. R., Cogswell, D. A., Kilcoyne, A. L. D., Tyliszczak, T., Bazant, M. Z., & Chueh, W. C. (2014). Current-induced transition from particle-by-particle to concurrent intercalation in phase-separating battery electrodes. Nature Materials. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4084
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.