The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global identification of peptidase specificity by multiplex substrate profiling
Open accessAbstract
We developed a simple and rapid multiplex substrate-profiling method to reveal the substrate specificity of any endo- or exopeptidase using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry sequencing. We generated a physicochemically diverse library of peptides by incorporating all combinations of neighbor and near-neighbor amino acid pairs into decapeptide sequences that are flanked by unique dipeptides at each terminus. Addition of a panel of evolutionarily diverse peptidases to a mixture of these tetradecapeptides generated information on prime and nonprime sites as well as on substrate specificity that matched or expanded upon known substrate motifs. This method biochemically confirmed the activity of the klassevirus 3C protein responsible for polypeptide processing and allowed granzyme B substrates to be ranked by enzymatic turnover efficiency using label-free quantitation of precursor-ion abundance. Additionally, the proteolytic secretions from schistosome parasitic flatworm larvae and a pancreatic cancer cell line were deconvoluted in a subtractive strategy using class-specific peptidase inhibitors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Elias, J. E., & Gygi, S. P. (2007) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth1019 · Cited by 3,925
Significance Analysis of Spectral Count Data in Label-free Shotgun Proteomics
Choi, H., Fermin, D., & Nesvizhskii, A. I. (2008) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m800203-mcp200 · Cited by 364
Cited by
Julien, O., & Wells, J. A. (2017) · Cell Death & Differentiation · doi:10.1038/cdd.2017.44 · Cited by 816
Leontovyč, A., Ulrychová, L., O’Donoghue, A. J., Vondrášek, J., Marešová, L., Hubálek, M., Fajtová, P., Chanová, M., Jiang, Z., Craik, C. S., et al. (2018) · PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0006446 · Cited by 45
Self-citationSampognaro, P. J., Arya, S., Knudsen, G. M., Gunderson, E. L., Sandoval-Perez, A., Hodul, M., Bowles, K., Craik, C. S., Jacobson, M. P., & Kao, A. W. (2023) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-023-00621-8 · Cited by 35
Self-citationDeep learning guided design of protease substrates
Martin-Alonso, C., Alamdari, S., Samad, T. S., Yang, K. K., Bhatia, S. N., & Amini, A. P. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-67226-1 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Donoghue, A. J., Eroy-Reveles, A. A., Knudsen, G. M., Ingram, J., Zhou, M., Statnekov, J. B., Greninger, A. L., Hostetter, D. R., Qu, G., Maltby, D. A., Anderson, M. O., DeRisi, J. L., McKerrow, J. H., Burlingame, A. L., & Craik, C. S.
- Venue
- Nature Methods
- Published
- 2012-09-30
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1095-1100
- ISSN
- 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-7105
- OpenAlex
- W2165824222
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.