CPTAC Assay Portal: a repository of targeted proteomic assays
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
NCI hosts open-access repositories of unified proteogenomics datasets, assays and reagents, including the Proteomic Data Commons, a fit-for-purpose targeted assay site and an antibody portal, largely due to CPTAC efforts.
“Largely due to these efforts, NCI hosts open-access repositories of unified proteogenomics datasets, assays and reagents, including the Proteomic Data Commons (pdc.cancer.gov), a fit-for-purpose targeted assay site (assays.cancer.gov)102,106 and an Ab portal (antibodies.cancer.gov)107.”
From A high-stringency blueprint of the human proteome (2020) · cites this paper as [106]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 13 · Cited by 223
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [9]Yang X Lazar IM BMC Cancer 2009 9 96 19327145 PMC2670839
- Authors
- the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC), Whiteaker, J. R., Halusa, G. N., Hoofnagle, A. N., Sharma, V., MacLean, B., Yan, P., Wrobel, J. A., Kennedy, J., Mani, D. R., Zimmerman, L. J., Meyer, M. R., Mesri, M., Rodriguez, H., & Paulovich, A. G.
- Affiliations
- Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
- Leidos (United States) (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Broad Institute (US)
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Paulovich, Amanda G
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Methods
- Published
- 2014-06-27
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 703-704
- ISSN
- 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-7105
- PMC
- PMC4113142
- OpenAlex
- W2012900739
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 5.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5u24ca160035-05)
- National Cancer Institute (U24CA159988, U24-CA-160035, U24CA160036, U24CA160019, U24CA160034, U01CA164186)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM103551, P41GM103533)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- targeted proteomics, multiple reaction monitoring, proteotyping
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Neoplasm Proteins, Mass Spectrometry, Databases, Protein, Proteomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
