Cited by 137Neuroscience and Music PerceptionHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsTactile and Sensory Interactions

Manipulating critical period closure across different sectors of the primary auditory cortex

Open access
de Villers-Sidani, Etienne, Simpson, Kimberly L, Lu, Y-F, Lin, Rick C S, Merzenich, Michael M·2008·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

During early brain development and through 'adult' experience-dependent plasticity, neural circuits are shaped to represent the external world with high fidelity. When raised in a quiet environment, the rat primary auditory cortex (A1) has a well-defined 'critical period', lasting several days, for its representation of sound frequency. The addition of environmental noise extends the critical period duration as a variable function of noise level. It remains unclear whether critical period closure should be regarded as a unified, externally gated event that applies for all of A1 or if it is controlled by progressive, local, activity-driven changes in this cortical area. We found that rearing rats in the presence of a spectrally limited noise band resulted in the closure of the critical period for A1 sectors representing the noise-free spectral bands, whereas the critical period appeared to remain open in noise-exposed sectors, where the cortex was still functionally and physically immature.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.2144

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The shift in inhibition is likely mediated by PV+ interneurons, which are also thought to regulate sensitive period plasticity in sensory cortex, making them attractive candidates for pubertal regulation of association cortex plasticity.

    “This shift in inhibition is likely mediated by PV+ interneurons, which are also thought to regulate sensitive period plasticity in sensory cortex (Davis et al., 2015; de Villers-Sidani et al., 2008; Hensch, 2005; Le Magueresse and Monyer, 2013; Werker and Hensch, 2015), and therefore are attractive candidates for pubertal regulation of association cortex plasticity.”

    From Does puberty mark a transition in sensitive periods for plasticity in the associative neocortex? (2017) · cites this paper as de Villers-Sidani et al., 2008

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 137

Authors
de Villers-Sidani, E., Simpson, K. L., Lu, Y.-F., Lin, R. C. S., & Merzenich, M. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2008-07-06
Volume
11
Issue
8
Pages
957-965
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2053516515
Cited by
137
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH077970)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS10414, P01NS034835, R01NS010414, F32NS010414, P02 NS34835-09)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
critical period, primary auditory cortex, experience-dependent plasticity, environmental noise, rearing conditions, cortical development, rat auditory cortex
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Auditory Cortex, Brain Mapping, Critical Period, Psychological, Electrodes, Implanted, Female, Hearing Tests, Neurons, Noise, Parvalbumins, Reaction Time, Spectrum Analysis, Time Factors, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Recovery of Function, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review