Cited by 354Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms

The binding sites for cocaine and dopamine in the dopamine transporter overlap

Open access
Beuming, Thijs, Kniazeff, Julie, Bergmann, Marianne L, Shi, Lei, Gracia, Luis, Raniszewska, Klaudia, Newman, Amy Hauck, Javitch, Jonathan A +3 more·2008·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Cocaine is a widely abused substance with psychostimulant effects that are attributed to inhibition of the dopamine transporter (DAT). We present molecular models for DAT binding of cocaine and cocaine analogs constructed from the high-resolution structure of the bacterial transporter homolog LeuT. Our models suggest that the binding site for cocaine and cocaine analogs is deeply buried between transmembrane segments 1, 3, 6 and 8, and overlaps with the binding sites for the substrates dopamine and amphetamine, as well as for benztropine-like DAT inhibitors. We validated our models by detailed mutagenesis and by trapping the radiolabeled cocaine analog [3H]CFT in the transporter, either by cross-linking engineered cysteines or with an engineered Zn2+-binding site that was situated extracellularly to the predicted common binding pocket. Our data demonstrate the molecular basis for the competitive inhibition of dopamine transport by cocaine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.2146

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cocaine blocks presynaptic dopamine reuptake and induces dopamine release, thereby increasing synaptic dopamine levels.

    “Cocaine blocks presynaptic dopamine reuptake175 and induces dopamine release176, thereby increasing synaptic dopamine levels.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beuming, T., Kniazeff, J., Bergmann, M. L., Shi, L., Gracia, L., Raniszewska, K., Newman, A. H., Javitch, J. A., Weinstein, H., Gether, U., & Loland, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Gether, Ulrik
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2008-06-22
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
780-789
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2019647316
Cited by
354
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 27
FWCI
10.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 22413, Z01DA000389, P01DA012408, K05DA022413)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Keywords
dopamine transporter, cocaine binding site, cocaine analogues, competitive inhibition, amphetamine, engineered cysteines, zinc binding site
MeSH terms
Animals, Binding Sites, Binding, Competitive, Chlorocebus aethiops, Cocaine, Dopamine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Models, Molecular, Structure-Activity Relationship, Time Factors, Transfection, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors, COS Cells, Amino Acid Substitution, Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review