The binding sites for cocaine and dopamine in the dopamine transporter overlap
Open accessAbstract
Cocaine is a widely abused substance with psychostimulant effects that are attributed to inhibition of the dopamine transporter (DAT). We present molecular models for DAT binding of cocaine and cocaine analogs constructed from the high-resolution structure of the bacterial transporter homolog LeuT. Our models suggest that the binding site for cocaine and cocaine analogs is deeply buried between transmembrane segments 1, 3, 6 and 8, and overlaps with the binding sites for the substrates dopamine and amphetamine, as well as for benztropine-like DAT inhibitors. We validated our models by detailed mutagenesis and by trapping the radiolabeled cocaine analog [3H]CFT in the transporter, either by cross-linking engineered cysteines or with an engineered Zn2+-binding site that was situated extracellularly to the predicted common binding pocket. Our data demonstrate the molecular basis for the competitive inhibition of dopamine transport by cocaine.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cocaine blocks presynaptic dopamine reuptake and induces dopamine release, thereby increasing synaptic dopamine levels.
“Cocaine blocks presynaptic dopamine reuptake175 and induces dopamine release176, thereby increasing synaptic dopamine levels.”
From The WAVE complex in developmental and adulthood brain disorders (2025) · cites this paper as [175]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The WAVE complex in developmental and adulthood brain disorders
Kim, H.-G., Berdasco, C., Nairn, A. C., & Kim, Y. (2025) · Experimental & Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/s12276-024-01386-w · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Beuming, T., Kniazeff, J., Bergmann, M. L., Shi, L., Gracia, L., Raniszewska, K., Newman, A. H., Javitch, J. A., Weinstein, H., Gether, U., & Loland, C. J.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Columbia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gether, Ulrik
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2008-06-22
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 780-789
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- PMC
- PMC2692229
- OpenAlex
- W2019647316
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 10.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 22413, Z01DA000389, P01DA012408, K05DA022413)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
- Keywords
- dopamine transporter, cocaine binding site, cocaine analogues, competitive inhibition, amphetamine, engineered cysteines, zinc binding site
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Binding Sites, Binding, Competitive, Chlorocebus aethiops, Cocaine, Dopamine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Models, Molecular, Structure-Activity Relationship, Time Factors, Transfection, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors, COS Cells, Amino Acid Substitution, Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review