Cited by 297Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurological disorders and treatments

D2R striatopallidal neurons inhibit both locomotor and drug reward processes

Open access
Durieux, Pierre F, Bearzatto, Bertrand, Guiducci, Stefania, Buch, Thorsten, Waisman, Ari, Zoli, Michele, Schiffmann, Serge N, de Kerchove d'Exaerde, Alban·2009·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

The specific functions of dopamine D(2) receptor-positive (D(2)R) striatopallidal neurons remain poorly understood. Using a genetic mouse model, we found that ablation of D(2)R neurons in the entire striatum induced hyperlocomotion, whereas ablation in the ventral striatum increased amphetamine conditioned place preference. Thus D(2)R striatopallidal neurons limit both locomotion and, unexpectedly, drug reinforcement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.2286

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 297

Authors
Durieux, P. F., Bearzatto, B., Guiducci, S., Buch, T., Waisman, A., Zoli, M., Schiffmann, S. N., & de Kerchove d'Exaerde, A.
Affiliations
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2009-03-08
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
393-395
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2069437503
Cited by
297
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 14
FWCI
6.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
dopamine D2 receptor, striatopallidal neurons, striatonigral neurons, GABAergic neurons, striatum, locomotion, hyperlocomotion, amphetamine, drug reward, conditioned place preference, ventral striatum, gene ablation
MeSH terms
Amphetamine, Animals, Autoradiography, Conditioning, Operant, Corpus Striatum, Diphtheria Toxin, Enkephalins, Gene Expression Regulation, Globus Pallidus, Glutamate Decarboxylase, Locomotion, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Protein Binding, Reinforcement Schedule, Reward, Time Factors, Tyrosine 3-Monooxygenase, Receptors, Dopamine D2, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors, Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Receptors, Adenosine A2, Mice, Heparin-binding EGF-like Growth Factor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review