Cited by 85Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesIon Channels and ReceptorsNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Representation and transformation of sensory information in the mouse accessory olfactory system

Open access
Meeks, Julian P, Arnson, Hannah A, Holy, Timothy E·2010·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

In mice, nonvolatile social cues are detected and analyzed by the accessory olfactory system (AOS). Here we provide a first view of information processing in the AOS with respect to individual chemical cues. 12 sulfated steroids, recently discovered mouse AOS ligands, caused widespread activity among vomeronasal sensory neurons (VSNs), yet VSN responses clustered into a small number of repeated functional patterns or processing streams. Downstream neurons in the accessory olfactory bulb (AOB) responded to these ligands with enhanced signal/noise compared to VSNs. Although the dendritic connectivity of AOB mitral cells suggests the capacity for broad integration, most sulfated steroid responses were well-modeled by linear excitatory drive from just one VSN processing stream. However, a substantial minority demonstrated multi-stream integration. Most VSN excitation patterns were also observed in the AOB, but excitation by estradiol sulfate processing streams was rare, suggesting AOB circuit organization is specific to the biological relevance of sensed cues.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.2546

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 85

Authors
Meeks, J. P., Arnson, H. A., & Holy, T. E.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Holy, Timothy E
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2010-05-09
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
723-730
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W1974326103
Cited by
85
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC005964, F32DC009352, R01DC010381)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
accessory olfactory system, vomeronasal sensory neurons, steroid sulfates, accessory olfactory bulb, mitral cells, social odors, estradiol sulfate, signal-to-noise ratio
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Cues, Dendrites, Estradiol, Male, Microelectrodes, Models, Neurological, Olfactory Bulb, Physical Stimulation, Sensory Receptor Cells, Social Perception, Steroids, Sulfates, Urine, Cluster Analysis, Linear Models, Vomeronasal Organ, Mice, Olfactory Perception, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review