Cited by 280Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Expectancy-related changes in firing of dopamine neurons depend on orbitofrontal cortex

Open access
Takahashi, Yuji K, Roesch, Matthew R, Wilson, Robert C, Toreson, Kathy, O'Donnell, Patricio, Niv, Yael, Schoenbaum, Geoffrey·2011·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

The orbitofrontal cortex has been hypothesized to carry information regarding the value of expected rewards. Such information is essential for associative learning, which relies on comparisons between expected and obtained reward for generating instructive error signals. These error signals are thought to be conveyed by dopamine neurons. To test whether orbitofrontal cortex contributes to these error signals, we recorded from dopamine neurons in orbitofrontal-lesioned rats performing a reward learning task. Lesions caused marked changes in dopaminergic error signaling. However, the effect of lesions was not consistent with a simple loss of information regarding expected value. Instead, without orbitofrontal input, dopaminergic error signals failed to reflect internal information about the impending response that distinguished externally similar states leading to differently valued future rewards. These results are consistent with current conceptualizations of orbitofrontal cortex as supporting model-based behavior and suggest an unexpected role for this information in dopaminergic error signaling.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.2957

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 47/12o provided the information of task states to support the credit assignment in VTA.

    “This result is consistent with the idea that 47/12o provided the information of task states to support the credit assignment in VTA.53”

    From Two prefrontal-subcortical circuits estimate controllability and reflect its impact on learning (2026) · cites this paper as [53]

    The Results (‘OFC signals state information to VTA’; page unavailable) propose that OFC supplies task-state identity information needed for value learning and VTA prediction-error signaling. But the study examined lesions of rat orbitofrontal regions, not 47/12o specifically, and its model routes state information through a value-learning system rather than directly to VTA dopamine neurons. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 280

Authors
Takahashi, Y. K., Roesch, M. R., Wilson, R. C., Toreson, K., O'Donnell, P., Niv, Y., & Schoenbaum, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Takahashi, Yuji K
  • Schoenbaum, Geoffrey
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2011-10-30
Volume
14
Issue
12
Pages
1590-1597
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2161046428
Cited by
280
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 12
FWCI
10.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K99MH083940)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA015718, K01DA021609, R01DA031695)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
orbitofrontal cortex, dopaminergic neurons, reward prediction error, model-based learning, reward value, lesion studies, error signal, associative learning, rats
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Biotin, Choice Behavior, Computer Simulation, Dopamine, Electric Stimulation, Male, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Reward, Time Factors, Tyrosine 3-Monooxygenase, Prefrontal Cortex, Ventral Tegmental Area, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review