Methylation on the mind
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Age-dependent DNA methylation that occur in the brain are associated with the risk of developing various neurological diseases, including AD.
“Age-dependent DNA methylation that occur in the brain are associated with the risk of developing various neurological diseases14, including AD15,16.”
From Integrated analysis of behavioral, epigenetic, and gut microbiome analyses in AppNL-G-F, AppNL-F, and wild type mice (2021) · cites this paper as [15]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 7
- Authors
- Flax, J. D., & Soloway, P. D.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Soloway, Paul D
- ORCID
- Soloway, Paul D
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2011-11-23
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1494-1496
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- OpenAlex
- W1983395147
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, DNA methylation, epigenetics, mouse brain, brain development, aging, neurodevelopmental disorders, genome-wide characterization
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Animals, Cerebellum, Cytosine, Hippocampus, Humans, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, 5-Methylcytosine, Epigenomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
