Social error monitoring in macaque frontal cortex
Abstract
Although much learning occurs through direct experience of errors, humans and other animals can learn from the errors of other individuals. The medial frontal cortex (MFC) processes self-generated errors, but the neuronal architecture and mechanisms underlying the monitoring of others' errors are poorly understood. Exploring such mechanisms is important, as they underlie observational learning and allow adaptive behavior in uncertain social environments. Using two paired monkeys that monitored each other's action for their own action selection, we identified a group of neurons in the MFC that exhibited a substantial activity increase that was associated with another's errors. Nearly half of these neurons showed activity changes consistent with general reward-omission signals, whereas the remaining neurons specifically responded to another's erroneous actions. These findings indicate that the MFC contains a dedicated circuit for monitoring others' mistakes during social interactions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior investigations in rodents and primates have provided evidence for neurons that encode information about other individuals, demonstrating changes in activity when animals observe another's appetitive or aversive experiences.
“Prior investigations in rodents and primates, for example, have provided evidence for the presence of neurons that encode information about other individuals, demonstrating changes in activity when the animals observe another’s appetitive or aversive experiences 1–11.”
From Reduced sociability and social agency encoding in adult Shank3-mutant mice are restored through gene re-expression in real time (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
Previous investigations have provided insight into how discrete aspects of another animal's experience, such as receipt of reward, may be encoded by cells.
“Previous investigations have provided insight into how discrete aspects of another animal’s experience, such as receipt of reward, may be encoded by cells 1–7,9.”
From Reduced sociability and social agency encoding in adult Shank3-mutant mice are restored through gene re-expression in real time (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 150
- Authors
- Yoshida, K., Saito, N., Iriki, A., & Isoda, M.
- Affiliations
- Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (JP)
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- RIKEN Center for Brain Science (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Iriki, Atsushi
- Isoda, Masaki
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2012-08-05
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1307-1312
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- OpenAlex
- W2092932120
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12
- FWCI
- 6.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (24300125, 21300321)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Keywords
- medial frontal cortex, observational learning, reward omission, social cognition, macaque, action selection
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Choice Behavior, Electrodes, Implanted, Interpersonal Relations, Macaca, Male, Motor Cortex, Neurons, Psychomotor Performance, Reward, Role, Social Behavior, Prefrontal Cortex, Feedback, Psychological, Electrophysiological Phenomena
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review