Cited by 399Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Transient stimulation of distinct subpopulations of striatal neurons mimics changes in action value

Open access
Tai, Lung-Hao, Lee, A Moses, Benavidez, Nora, Bonci, Antonello, Wilbrecht, Linda·2012·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

In changing environments, animals must adaptively select actions to achieve their goals. In tasks involving goal-directed action selection, striatal neural activity has been shown to represent the value of competing actions. Striatal representations of action value could potentially bias responses toward actions of higher value. However, no study to date has demonstrated the direct effect of distinct striatal pathways in goal-directed action selection. We found that transient optogenetic stimulation of dorsal striatal dopamine D1 and D2 receptor-expressing neurons during decision-making in mice introduced opposing biases in the distribution of choices. The effect of stimulation on choice was dependent on recent reward history and mimicked an additive change in the action value. Although stimulation before and during movement initiation produced a robust bias in choice behavior, this bias was substantially diminished when stimulation was delayed after response initiation. Together, our data suggest that striatal activity is involved in goal-directed action selection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.3188

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The insula's projection to the striatum underscores its pivotal role in motor control and action selection.

    “the insula allocates over one-third of its projection to the striatum, particularly the dorsal region, underscoring its pivotal role in motor control and action selection [21][22][23][24].”

    From The Insular Cortex: An Interface Between Sensation, Emotion and Cognition (2024) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Discussion reports that striatal activity influences action selection and movement initiation. It does not identify an insula-to-striatum projection or establish that the insula has a pivotal role in motor control or action selection; searches for insula and insular projections found no such passage. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 399

Authors
Tai, L.-H., Lee, A. M., Benavidez, N., Bonci, A., & Wilbrecht, L.
Affiliations
  • Ernest Gallo Clinic and Research Center (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (US)
Corresponding author
Wilbrecht, Linda
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2012-08-19
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
1281-1289
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W1971501199
Cited by
399
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 1
FWCI
10.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5rc2ns069350-02)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH087542)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA029150)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007618)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (RC2-NS-069350, 1RC2NS069350)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
dorsal striatum, action value, optogenetic stimulation, decision-making, choice bias, reward history, movement initiation
MeSH terms
Channelrhodopsins, Action Potentials, Dependovirus, Algorithms, Animals, Choice Behavior, Corpus Striatum, DNA, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Plasmids, Reward, Logistic Models, Receptors, Dopamine D1, Receptors, Dopamine D2, Mice, Optical Fibers, Electrophysiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review