Cited by 96EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesMotor Control and AdaptationNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

Neural population partitioning and a concurrent brain-machine interface for sequential motor function

Open access
Shanechi, Maryam M, Hu, Rollin C, Powers, Marissa, Wornell, Gregory W, Brown, Emery N, Williams, Ziv M·2012·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Although brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) have focused largely on performing single-targeted movements, many natural tasks involve planning a complete sequence of such movements before execution. For these tasks, a BMI that can concurrently decode the full planned sequence before its execution may also consider the higher-level goal of the task to reformulate and perform it more effectively. Using population-wide modeling, we discovered two distinct subpopulations of neurons in the rhesus monkey premotor cortex that allow two planned targets of a sequential movement to be simultaneously held in working memory without degradation. Such marked stability occurred because each subpopulation encoded either only currently held or only newly added target information irrespective of the exact sequence. On the basis of these findings, we developed a BMI that concurrently decodes a full motor sequence in advance of movement and can then accurately execute it as desired.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.3250

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 96

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [49]Brown EN Barbieri R Eden UT Frank LM Feng J Likelihood methods for neural data analysis Computational Neuroscience: A Comprehensive Approach 2003 253 286 CRC Press Boca Raton

Authors
Shanechi, M. M., Hu, R. C., Powers, M., Wornell, G. W., Brown, E. N., & Williams, Z. M.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, Ziv M
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2012-11-11
Volume
15
Issue
12
Pages
1715-1722
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2015667795
Cited by
96
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PMC
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (DP1OD003646)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD059852, 5R01-HD059852)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
brain-computer interface, premotor cortex, population coding, working memory, target stability, rhesus monkeys
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Macaca mulatta, Male, Motor Cortex, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Random Allocation, Reaction Time, Brain-Computer Interfaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review