Oxytocin mediates early experience-dependent cross-modal plasticity in the sensory cortices
Open accessAbstract
Sensory experience is critical to development and plasticity of neural circuits. Here we report a new form of plasticity in neonatal mice, where early sensory experience cross-modally regulates development of all sensory cortices via oxytocin signaling. Unimodal sensory deprivation from birth through whisker deprivation or dark rearing reduced excitatory synaptic transmission in the correspondent sensory cortex and cross-modally in other sensory cortices. Sensory experience regulated synthesis and secretion of the neuropeptide oxytocin as well as its level in the cortex. Both in vivo oxytocin injection and increased sensory experience elevated excitatory synaptic transmission in multiple sensory cortices and significantly rescued the effects of sensory deprivation. Together, these results identify a new function for oxytocin in promoting cross-modal, experience-dependent cortical development. This link between sensory experience and oxytocin is particularly relevant to autism, where hypersensitivity or hyposensitivity to sensory inputs is prevalent and oxytocin is a hotly debated potential therapy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Parental/sensory deprivation or cesarean delivery can lead to disruptions of hypothalamic oxytocin and maternal behavior, while in rats enriched environments increase hypothalamic oxytocin in dams and their male offspring.
“Additionally, parental/sensory deprivation or cesarean delivery can lead to disruptions of hypothalamic OXT and maternal behavior (127-130), while, in rats, enriched environments increase hypothalamic OXT in dams and their male offspring (131).”
From Oxytocin, Vasopressin, and Social Behavior: From Neural Circuits to Clinical Opportunities (2022) · cites this paper as [127]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 206
- Authors
- Zheng, J.-J., Li, S.-J., Zhang, X.-D., Miao, W.-Y., Zhang, D., Yao, H., & Yu, X.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Yu, Xiang
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2014-01-26
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 391-399
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- OpenAlex
- W2141984006
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 9
- FWCI
- 34.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- escholarship.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- oxytocin, cross-modal plasticity, experience-dependent plasticity, whisker deprivation, dark rearing, excitatory synaptic transmission, autism spectrum disorder
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animals, Newborn, Female, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Oxytocin, Sensory Deprivation, Somatosensory Cortex, Signal Transduction, Mice, Knockout, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review