Two distinct layer-specific dynamics of cortical ensembles during learning of a motor task
Abstract
The primary motor cortex (M1) possesses two intermediate layers upstream of the motor-output layer: layer 2/3 (L2/3) and layer 5a (L5a). Although repetitive training often improves motor performance and movement coding by M1 neuronal ensembles, it is unclear how neuronal activities in L2/3 and L5a are reorganized during motor task learning. We conducted two-photon calcium imaging in mouse M1 during 14 training sessions of a self-initiated lever-pull task. In L2/3, the accuracy of neuronal ensemble prediction of lever trajectory remained unchanged globally, with a subset of individual neurons retaining high prediction accuracy throughout the training period. However, in L5a, the ensemble prediction accuracy steadily improved, and one-third of neurons, including subcortical projection neurons, evolved to contribute substantially to ensemble prediction in the late stage of learning. The L2/3 network may represent coordination of signals from other areas throughout learning, whereas L5a may participate in the evolving network representing well-learned movements.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The activity of M1 cortical neurons dynamically changes during motor learning.
“We focused on the primary motor cortex (M1), as the proliferation and differentiation of M1 OPCs is accelerated, and the activity of M1 cortical neurons dynamically changes during motor learning (Huber et al., 2012 ; Masamizu et al., 2014 ; McKenzie et al., 2014 ; Peters, Chen, & Komiyama, 2014 ; Xiao et al., 2016 ).”
From Motor learning requires myelination to reduce asynchrony and spontaneity in neural activity (2020) · cites this paper as Masamizu et al., 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 164
- Authors
- Masamizu, Y., Tanaka, Y. R., Tanaka, Y. H., Hira, R., Ohkubo, F., Kitamura, K., Isomura, Y., Okada, T., & Matsuzaki, M.
- Affiliations
- National Institute for Basic Biology (JP)
- Japan Science and Technology Agency (JP)
- Tamagawa University (JP)
- National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Matsuzaki, Masanori
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2014-06-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 987-994
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- OpenAlex
- W2020128812
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 8.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25115705, 23300148, 24300143, 25113705, 14J08449, 25290003, 26830020, 25560432)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- motor cortex, motor learning, neuronal ensembles, layer 2/3, primary motor cortex, ensemble forecasting, cortical reorganization, two-photon calcium imaging, mice
- MeSH terms
- Dependovirus, Animals, Conditioning, Operant, Efferent Pathways, Forelimb, Genetic Vectors, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Learning, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Motor Cortex, Motor Neurons, Motor Skills, Neurons, Psychomotor Performance, Reward, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Mice, Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 5, Neuroimaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review