Cited by 164Motor Control and AdaptationMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural dynamics and brain function

Two distinct layer-specific dynamics of cortical ensembles during learning of a motor task

Masamizu, Yoshito, Tanaka, Yasuhiro R, Tanaka, Yasuyo H, Hira, Riichiro, Ohkubo, Fuki, Kitamura, Kazuo, Isomura, Yoshikazu, Okada, Takashi +1 more·2014·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

The primary motor cortex (M1) possesses two intermediate layers upstream of the motor-output layer: layer 2/3 (L2/3) and layer 5a (L5a). Although repetitive training often improves motor performance and movement coding by M1 neuronal ensembles, it is unclear how neuronal activities in L2/3 and L5a are reorganized during motor task learning. We conducted two-photon calcium imaging in mouse M1 during 14 training sessions of a self-initiated lever-pull task. In L2/3, the accuracy of neuronal ensemble prediction of lever trajectory remained unchanged globally, with a subset of individual neurons retaining high prediction accuracy throughout the training period. However, in L5a, the ensemble prediction accuracy steadily improved, and one-third of neurons, including subcortical projection neurons, evolved to contribute substantially to ensemble prediction in the late stage of learning. The L2/3 network may represent coordination of signals from other areas throughout learning, whereas L5a may participate in the evolving network representing well-learned movements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.3739

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The activity of M1 cortical neurons dynamically changes during motor learning.

    “We focused on the primary motor cortex (M1), as the proliferation and differentiation of M1 OPCs is accelerated, and the activity of M1 cortical neurons dynamically changes during motor learning (Huber et al., 2012 ; Masamizu et al., 2014 ; McKenzie et al., 2014 ; Peters, Chen, & Komiyama, 2014 ; Xiao et al., 2016 ).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 164

Authors
Masamizu, Y., Tanaka, Y. R., Tanaka, Y. H., Hira, R., Ohkubo, F., Kitamura, K., Isomura, Y., Okada, T., & Matsuzaki, M.
Affiliations
  • National Institute for Basic Biology (JP)
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (JP)
  • Tamagawa University (JP)
  • National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP)
Corresponding author
Matsuzaki, Masanori
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2014-06-01
Volume
17
Issue
7
Pages
987-994
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2020128812
Cited by
164
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 4
FWCI
8.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25115705, 23300148, 24300143, 25113705, 14J08449, 25290003, 26830020, 25560432)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
motor cortex, motor learning, neuronal ensembles, layer 2/3, primary motor cortex, ensemble forecasting, cortical reorganization, two-photon calcium imaging, mice
MeSH terms
Dependovirus, Animals, Conditioning, Operant, Efferent Pathways, Forelimb, Genetic Vectors, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Learning, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Motor Cortex, Motor Neurons, Motor Skills, Neurons, Psychomotor Performance, Reward, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Mice, Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 5, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review