Cited by 223Genetic Associations and EpidemiologySchizophrenia research and treatmentGenomics and Rare Diseases

The road to precision psychiatry: translating genetics into disease mechanisms

Open access
Gandal, Michael J, Leppa, Virpi, Won, Hyejung, Parikshak, Neelroop N, Geschwind, Daniel H·2016·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Hundreds of genetic loci increasing risk for neuropsychiatric disorders have recently been identified. This success, perhaps paradoxically, has posed challenges for therapeutic development, which are amplified by the highly polygenic and pleiotropic nature of these genetic contributions. Success requires understanding the biological impact of single genetic variants and predicting their effects within an individual. Comprehensive functional genomic annotation of risk loci provides a framework for interpretation of neurobiological impact, requiring experimental validation with in vivo or in vitro model systems. Systems-level, integrative pathway analyses are beginning to elucidate the additive, polygenic contributions of risk variants on specific cellular, molecular, developmental, or circuit-level processes. Although most neuropsychiatric disease modeling has focused on genes disrupted by rare, large-effect-size mutations, common smaller-effect-size variants may also provide solid therapeutic targets to inform precision medicine approaches. Here we enumerate the promise and challenges of a genomics-driven approach to uncovering neuropsychiatric disease mechanisms and facilitating therapeutic development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.4409

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 151 · Cited by 223

Authors
Gandal, M. J., Leppa, V., Won, H., Parikshak, N. N., & Geschwind, D. H.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Geschwind, Daniel H
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2016-10-26
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
1397-1407
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2544315804
Cited by
223
References
151
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 4
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh094714-04)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH109912, R01-MH094714, F30MH099886, P50MH106438)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
precision psychiatry, neuropsychiatric disorders, genetic risk variants, polygenic risk, pleiotropy, functional genomic annotation, disease mechanisms, treatment development, common genetic variants, rare mutations, pathway analysis, model systems, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Mutation, Psychotherapeutic Processes, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Multifactorial Inheritance, Genome-Wide Association Study, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review