Intelligence tests predict brain response to demanding task events
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Differentiating lures from targets is difficult-participants tend to press the button upon detecting a repetition, even with different intervals.
“Differentiating lures from targets is difficult—participants tend to press the button upon detecting a repetition, even with different intervals (Duncan, 2003).”
From Training-induced improvement in working memory tasks results from switching to efficient strategies (2021) · cites this paper as Duncan, 2003
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 37
- Authors
- Duncan, J.
- Affiliations
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Duncan, John
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 207-208
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- OpenAlex
- W2006533986
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 2.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- general intelligence, intelligence test scores, cognitive control, cognitive conflict, prefrontal cortex
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Haplorhini, Brain, Choice Behavior, Cognition, Conflict, Psychological, Humans, Intelligence Tests, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory, Short-Term, Photic Stimulation, Predictive Value of Tests, Problem Solving
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
