Cited by 426Ion channel regulation and functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain function

Variable channel expression in identified single and electrically coupled neurons in different animals

Schulz, David J, Goaillard, Jean-Marc, Marder, Eve·2006·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

It is often assumed that all neurons of the same cell type have identical intrinsic properties, both within an animal and between animals. We exploited the large size and small number of unambiguously identifiable neurons in the crab stomatogastric ganglion to test this assumption at the level of channel mRNA expression and membrane currents (measured in voltage-clamp experiments). In lateral pyloric (LP) neurons, we saw strong correlations between measured current and the abundance of Shal and BK-KCa mRNAs (encoding the Shal-family voltage-gated potassium channel and large-conductance calcium-activated potassium channel, respectively). We also saw two- to fourfold interanimal variability for three potassium currents and their mRNA expression. Measurements of channel expression in the two electrically coupled pyloric dilator (PD) neurons showed significant interanimal variability, but copy numbers for IH (encoding the hyperpolarization-activated, inward-current channel) and Shal mRNA in the two PD neurons from the same crab were similar, suggesting that the regulation of some currents may be shared in electrically coupled neurons.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn1639

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In wild-type populations of animals with similar performance profiles, 2-7 fold variations in the mRNA expression of most cellular components are seen in identified neurons across individuals.

    “In wild-type populations of animals with similar performance profiles, 2-7 fold variations in the mRNA expression of most cellular components are seen in identified neurons across individuals [25-30]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schulz, D. J., Goaillard, J.-M., & Marder, E.
Affiliations
Brandeis University (US)
Corresponding author
Schulz, David J
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2006-01-29
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
356-362
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2107799893
Cited by
426
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 24
FWCI
7.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 46742, MH 70292, F32MH070292)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS017813, NS17813)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
interindividual variability, stomatogastric ganglion, lateral pyloric neuron, pyloric dilator neuron, membrane currents, electrical coupling
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Biological Clocks, Cell Communication, Brachyura, Gene Expression Regulation, Membrane Potentials, Molecular Sequence Data, Nervous System, Neural Conduction, Neural Inhibition, Neurons, Potassium, RNA, Messenger, Gap Junctions, Ganglia, Invertebrate, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Shal Potassium Channels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review