Cited by 245Reading and Literacy DevelopmentDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyLanguage Development and Disorders

Dyslexia and the failure to form a perceptual anchor

Ahissar, Merav, Lubin, Yedida, Putter-Katz, Hanna, Banai, Karen·2006·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

In a large subgroup of dyslexic individuals (D-LDs), reading difficulties are part of a broader learning and language disability. Recent studies indicate that D-LDs perform poorly in many psychoacoustic tasks compared with individuals with normal reading ability. We found that D-LDs perform as well as normal readers in speech perception in noise and in a difficult tone comparison task. However, their performance did not improve when these same tasks were performed with a smaller stimulus set. In contrast to normal readers, they did not benefit from stimulus-specific repetitions, suggesting that they have difficulties forming perceptual anchors. These findings are inconsistent with previously suggested static models of dyslexia. Instead, we propose that D-LDs' core deficit is a general difficulty in dynamically constructing stimulus-specific predictions, deriving from deficient stimulus-specific adaptation mechanisms. This hypothesis provides a direct link between D-LDs' high-level difficulties and mechanisms at the level of specific neuronal circuits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn1800

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Changes in the S1 representational territory are strongly related to nursing experience as they are absent in postpartum rats whose litters have been removed on the day of birth.

    “Changes in the S1 representational territory are strongly related to nursing experience as it is absent in postpartum rats (Fig. 1A, ‘Non-lactating’) whose litters have been removed on the day of birth”

    From Neuromodulation of maternal circuits by oxytocin (2019) · cites this paper as Xerri et al., 1994

  • The expansion of the ventrum representation is displayed by a two-fold increase of the area representing the nipples and areolae.

    “This is displayed by a two-fold increase of the area representing the nipples and areolae”

    From Neuromodulation of maternal circuits by oxytocin (2019) · cites this paper as Xerri et al., 1994

  • Long-lasting plasticity in somatosensory and auditory cortex contributes to increased responsiveness to infant cues.

    “long-lasting plasticity in somatosensory (Rosselet et al., 2006; Xerri et al., 1994) and auditory (Cohen et al., 2011; Cohen and Mizrahi, 2015; Liu et al., 2006; Liu and Schreiner, 2007; Marlin et al., 2015; Shepard et al., 2016; Tasaka et al., 2018) cortex have recently been shown to contribute to increased responsiveness to infant cues”

    From Neuromodulation of maternal circuits by oxytocin (2019) · cites this paper as Xerri et al., 1994

  • In the primary area of the somatosensory cortex, the representation of the ventrum is expanded in primiparous lactating rats compared to virgins.

    “In the primary area of the somatosensory cortex (S1), the representation of the ventrum is expanded in primiparous lactating rats compared to virgins”

    From Neuromodulation of maternal circuits by oxytocin (2019) · cites this paper as Xerri et al., 1994

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 245

Authors
Ahissar, M., Lubin, Y., Putter-Katz, H., & Banai, K.
Affiliations
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Ahissar, Merav
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2006-11-19
Volume
9
Issue
12
Pages
1558-1564
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W1988631043
Cited by
245
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 19
FWCI
16.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Volkswagen Foundation
  • Israel Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
dyslexia, speech perception in noise, stimulus-specific adaptation, learning disabilities, language disorders, dynamic prediction
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Child, Cognition, Dyslexia, Female, Humans, Learning, Learning Disabilities, Mental Recall, Set, Psychology, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review