Human fMRI evidence for the neural correlates of preparatory set
Open accessAbstract
We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to study readiness and intention signals in frontal and parietal areas that have been implicated in planning saccadic eye movements-the frontal eye fields (FEF) and intraparietal sulcus (IPS). To track fMRI signal changes correlated with readiness to act, we used an event-related design with variable gap periods between disappearance of the fixation point and appearance of the target. To track changes associated with intention, subjects were instructed before the gap period to make either a pro-saccade (look at target) or an anti-saccade (look away from target). FEF activation increased during the gap period and was higher for anti- than for pro-saccade trials. No signal increases were observed during the gap period in the IPS. Our findings suggest that within the frontoparietal networks that control saccade generation, the human FEF, but not the IPS, is critically involved in preparatory set, coding both the readiness and intention to perform a particular movement.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The prefrontal cortex is involved in executive cognitive functions such as reasoning, planning, attention, working memory, and some aspects of language.
“The prefrontal cortex is sometimes described as the “highest” structure of the brain because it is involved in executive cognitive functions such as reasoning, planning, attention, working memory, and some aspects of language (e.g. Connolly et al., 2002).”
From High pregnancy anxiety during mid-gestation is associated with decreased gray matter density in 6-9-year-old children. (2010) · cites this paper as Connolly et al., 2002
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 336
- Authors
- Connolly, J. D., Goodale, M. A., Menon, R. S., & Munoz, D. P.
- Affiliations
- Western University (CA)
- Robarts Clinical Trials (CA)
- Queen's University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Goodale, Melvyn A.
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2002-11-04
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1345-1352
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- OpenAlex
- W2099114757
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 9.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Funders
- University of Minnesota
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- preparatory set, saccades, frontal eye field, intraparietal sulcus, movement intention, antisaccades, prosaccades, frontoparietal network
- MeSH terms
- Brain Mapping, Evoked Potentials, Eye Movements, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Orientation, Parietal Lobe, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Space Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review