Cited by 852Advanced Photocatalysis TechniquesTiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar CellsIron oxide chemistry and applications

Efficient solar water-splitting using a nanocrystalline CoO photocatalyst

Liao, Longb, Zhang, Qiuhui, Su, Zhihua, Zhao, Zhongzheng, Wang, Yanan, Li, Yang, Lu, Xiaoxiang, Wei, Dongguang +9 more·2014·Nature Nanotechnology

Abstract

The generation of hydrogen from water using sunlight could potentially form the basis of a clean and renewable source of energy. Various water-splitting methods have been investigated previously, but the use of photocatalysts to split water into stoichiometric amounts of H2 and O2 (overall water splitting) without the use of external bias or sacrificial reagents is of particular interest because of its simplicity and potential low cost of operation. However, despite progress in the past decade, semiconductor water-splitting photocatalysts (such as (Ga1-xZnx)(N1-xOx)) do not exhibit good activity beyond 440 nm (refs 1,2,9) and water-splitting devices that can harvest visible light typically have a low solar-to-hydrogen efficiency of around 0.1%. Here we show that cobalt(II) oxide (CoO) nanoparticles can carry out overall water splitting with a solar-to-hydrogen efficiency of around 5%. The photocatalysts were synthesized from non-active CoO micropowders using two distinct methods (femtosecond laser ablation and mechanical ball milling), and the CoO nanoparticles that result can decompose pure water under visible-light irradiation without any co-catalysts or sacrificial reagents. Using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, we show that the high photocatalytic activity of the nanoparticles arises from a significant shift in the position of the band edge of the material.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nnano.2013.272

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liao, L., Zhang, Q., Su, Z., Zhao, Z., Wang, Y., Li, Y., Lu, X., Wei, D., Feng, G., Yu, Q., Cai, X., Zhao, J., Ren, Z., Fang, H., Robles-Hernandez, F., Baldelli, S., & Bao, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Houston (US)
  • Sichuan University (CN)
  • Texas State University (US)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Sam Houston State University (US)
Corresponding author
Bao, Jiming
Venue
Nature Nanotechnology
Published
2013-12-15
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
69-73
ISSN
  • 1748-3387 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-3395
OpenAlex
W2064786858
Cited by
852
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 89 · 2018: 97 · 2017: 102 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 31
FWCI
22.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Nanotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Welch Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Iron oxide chemistry and applications
Keywords
solar water splitting, cobalt oxide, CoO nanoparticles, photocatalysis, hydrogen production, visible light photocatalysis, band edge shift, femtosecond laser ablation, ball milling, solar-to-hydrogen efficiency, nanocrystalline photocatalyst

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review