The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A magneto-DNA nanoparticle system for rapid detection and phenotyping of bacteria
Open accessAbstract
To date, while various diagnostic approaches for pathogen detection have been proposed, most are too expensive, lengthy or limited in specificity for clinical use. Nanoparticle systems with unique material properties, however, circumvent these problems and offer improved accuracy over current methods. Herein, we present novel magneto-DNA probes capable of rapid and specific profiling of pathogens directly in clinical samples. A nanoparticle hybridisation assay, involving ubiquitous and specific probes that target bacterial 16S rRNAs, was designed to detect amplified target DNAs using a miniaturised nuclear magnetic resonance device. Ultimately, the magneto-DNA platform allowed both universal and specific detection of various clinically relevant bacterial species, with sensitivity down to single bacteria. Furthermore, the assay was robust and rapid, simultaneously diagnosing a panel of 13 bacterial species in clinical specimens within 2 hours. The generic platform described could be used to rapidly identify and phenotype pathogens for a variety of applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Allegranzi, B., Nejad, S. B., Combescure, C., Graafmans, W., Attar, H., Donaldson, L., & Pittet, D. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61458-4 · Cited by 2,514
Systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological therapies for children with chronic pain
Fisher, E., Heathcote, L., Palermo, T. M., de C Williams, A. C., Lau, J., & Eccleston, C. (2014) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsu008 · Cited by 710
Cited by
Point-of-care microfluidic devices for pathogen detection
Nasseri, B., Soleimani, N., Rabiee, N., Kalbasi, A., Karimi, M., & Hamblin, M. R. (2018) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2018.05.050 · Cited by 382
The Era of Digital Health: A Review of Portable and Wearable Affinity Biosensors
Tu, J., Torrente‐Rodríguez, R. M., Wang, M., & Gao, W. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201906713 · Cited by 357
Nanoparticle approaches against bacterial infections
Gao, W., Thamphiwatana, S., Angsantikul, P., & Zhang, L. (2014) · WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1002/wnan.1282 · Cited by 347
Recent Developments in Magnetic Diagnostic Systems
Lee, H., Shin, T.-H., Cheon, J., & Weissleder, R. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500698d · Cited by 292
Self-citationNanotools for Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Papafilippou, L., Claxton, A., Dark, P., Kostarelos, K., & Hadjidemetriou, M. (2021) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202001378 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Chung, H. J., Castro, C. M., Im, H., Lee, H., & Weissleder, R.
- Venue
- Nature Nanotechnology
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 369-375
- ISSN
- 1748-3387 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-3395
- OpenAlex
- W2006101840
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A magneto-DNA nanoparticle system for rapid detection and phenotyping of bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nnano.2013.70
- The paper
- Chung, H. J., Castro, C. M., Im, H., Lee, H., & Weissleder, R. (2013). A magneto-DNA nanoparticle system for rapid detection and phenotyping of bacteria. Nature Nanotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.70
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
