The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strongly correlated photons on a chip
Open accessAbstract
Optical nonlinearities at the single-photon level are key ingredients for future photonic quantum technologies1. Prime candidates for the realization of the strong photon–photon interactions necessary for implementing quantum information processing tasks2, as well as for studying strongly correlated photons3,4,5,6 in an integrated photonic device setting, are quantum dots embedded in photonic-crystal nanocavities. Here, we report strong quantum correlations between photons on picosecond timescales. We observe (i) photon antibunching upon resonant excitation of the lowest-energy polariton state, proving that the first cavity photon blocks the subsequent injection events, and (ii) photon bunching when the laser field is in two-photon resonance with the polariton eigenstates of the second Jaynes–Cummings manifold7,8, demonstrating that two photons at this colour are more likely to be injected into the cavity jointly than they would otherwise. Together, these results demonstrate unprecedented strong single-photon nonlinearities, paving the way for the realization of a quantum optical Josephson interferometer9 or a single-photon transistor10. Researchers observe a continuous change in photon correlations from strong antibunching to bunching by tuning either the probe laser or the cavity mode frequency. These results, which demonstrate unprecedented strong single-photon nonlinearities in quantum dot cavity system, are explained by the photon blockade and tunnelling in the anharmonic Jaynes–Cummings model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Strongly interacting polaritons in coupled arrays of cavities
Hartmann, M. J., Brandão, F. G. S. L., & Plenio, M. B. (2006) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys462 · Cited by 961
Quantum phase transitions of light
Greentree, A. D., Tahan, C., Cole, J. H., & Hollenberg, L. C. L. (2006) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys466 · Cited by 788 · cited 3×
“Depending on the particular device, however, the effect is more or less pronounced [4].”
Background
Cited by
Ozawa, T., Price, H. M., Amo, A., Goldman, N., Hafezi, M., Lu, L., Rechtsman, M. C., Schuster, D., Simon, J., Zilberberg, O., et al. (2019) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.015006 · Cited by 3,722
Carusotto, I., & Ciuti, C. (2013) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.85.299 · Cited by 1,996
Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures
Lodahl, P., Mahmoodian, S., & Stobbe, S. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.347 · Cited by 1,465
Quantum trajectories and open many-body quantum systems
Daley, A. J. (2014) · Advances in Physics · doi:10.1080/00018732.2014.933502 · Cited by 853
Quantum nonlinear optics with single photons enabled by strongly interacting atoms
Peyronel, T., Firstenberg, O., Liang, Q.-Y., Hofferberth, S., Gorshkov, A. V., Pohl, T., Lukin, M. D., & Vuletić, V. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11361 · Cited by 844
Metadata
- Authors
- Reinhard, A., Volz, T., Winger, M., Badolato, A., Hennessy, K. J., Hu, E. L., & Imamoğlu, A.
- Venue
- Nature Photonics
- Published
- 2011-12-18
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 93-96
- ISSN
- 1749-4885 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-4893
- OpenAlex
- W2029283731
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strongly correlated photons on a chip. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nphoton.2011.321
- The paper
- Reinhard, A., Volz, T., Winger, M., Badolato, A., Hennessy, K. J., Hu, E. L., & Imamoğlu, A. (2012). Strongly correlated photons on a chip. Nature Photonics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2011.321
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.