Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nonlinear response of the vacuum Rabi resonance

Open access
Bishop, Lev S., Chow, J. M., Koch, Jens, Houck, A. A., Devoret, M. H., Thuneberg, E., Girvin, S. M., Schoelkopf, R. J.·2009·Nature Physics

Abstract

The exploration of the Jaynes–Cummings Hamiltonian in a circuit-QED system—where an ‘artificial atom’ made of a superconducting circuit is strongly coupled to a microwave field—provides direct evidence for nonlinearities due to quantum mechanics on the level of single atoms and photons. On the level of single atoms and photons, the coupling between atoms and the electromagnetic field is typically very weak. By using a cavity to confine the field, the strength of this interaction can be increased by many orders of magnitude, to a point where it dominates over any dissipative process. This strong-coupling regime of cavity quantum electrodynamics1,2 has been reached for real atoms in optical cavities3, and for artificial atoms in circuit quantum electrodynamics4 and quantum dot systems5,6. A signature of strong coupling is the splitting of the cavity transmission peak into a pair of resolvable peaks when a single resonant atom is placed inside the cavity, an effect known as vacuum Rabi splitting. The circuit quantum electrodynamics architecture is ideally suited for going beyond this linear-response effect. Here, we show that increasing the drive power results in two unique nonlinear features in the transmitted heterodyne signal: the supersplitting of each vacuum Rabi peak into a doublet and the appearance of extra peaks with the characteristic spacing of the Jaynes–Cummings ladder. These findings constitute direct evidence for the coupling between the quantized microwave field and the anharmonic spectrum of a superconducting qubit acting as an artificial atom.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphys1154

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
Bishop, L. S., Chow, J. M., Koch, J., Houck, A. A., Devoret, M. H., Thuneberg, E., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J.
Venue
Nature Physics
Published
2008-12-14
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
105-109
ISSN
  • 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-2481
OpenAlex
W2006011312
Cited by
284
References
2
FWCI
11.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonlinear response of the vacuum Rabi resonance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nphys1154
The paper
Bishop, L. S., Chow, J. M., Koch, J., Houck, A. A., Devoret, M. H., Thuneberg, E., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2009). Nonlinear response of the vacuum Rabi resonance. Nature Physics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1154

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.