The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum process tomography of a universal entangling gate implemented with Josephson phase qubits
Open accessAbstract
Quantum process tomography provides a means of benchmarking the components and algorithms of a quantum computer in a quantitative fashion, independent of the particular architecture used. Such a procedure has now been demonstrated for a universal entangling gate in a solid-state system. Quantum gates must perform reliably when operating on standard input basis states and on complex superpositions thereof. Experiments using superconducting qubits have validated truth tables for particular implementations of, for example, the controlled-NOT gate1,2, but have not fully characterized gate operation for arbitrary superpositions of input states. Here we demonstrate the use of quantum process tomography3,4 (QPT) to fully characterize the performance of a universal entangling gate between two superconducting qubits. Process tomography permits complete gate analysis, but requires precise preparation of arbitrary input states, control over the subsequent qubit interaction and ideally simultaneous single-shot measurement of output states. In recent work, it has been proposed to use QPT to probe noise properties5 and time dynamics6 of qubit systems and to apply techniques from control theory to create scalable qubit benchmarking protocols7,8. We use QPT to measure the fidelity and noise properties5 of an entangling gate. In addition to demonstrating a promising fidelity, our entangling gate has an on-to-off ratio of 300, a level of adjustable coupling that will become a requirement for future high-fidelity devices. This is the first solid-state demonstration of QPT in a two-qubit system, as QPT has previously been demonstrated only with single solid-state qubits9,10,11.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
Quantum Process Tomography of a Controlled-NOT Gate
O'Brien, J. L., Pryde, G. J., Gilchrist, A., James, D. F. V., Langford, N. K., Ralph, T. C., & White, A. G. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.080502 · Cited by 499
Realization of quantum process tomography in NMR
Childs, A. M., Chuang, I. L., & Leung, D. W. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.012314 · Cited by 205
Cited by
Atomic physics and quantum optics using superconducting circuits
You, J. Q., & Nori, F. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10122 · Cited by 1,311
Efficient Variational Quantum Simulator Incorporating Active Error Minimization
Li, Y., & Benjamin, S. C. (2017) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.7.021050 · Cited by 686
Demonstration of Blind Quantum Computing
Barz, S., Kashefi, E., Broadbent, A., Fitzsimons, J. F., Zeilinger, A., & Walther, P. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1214707 · Cited by 475
Tunable Coupling Scheme for Implementing High-Fidelity Two-Qubit Gates
Yan, F., Krantz, P., Sung, Y., Kjaergaard, M., Campbell, D. L., Orlando, T. P., Gustavsson, S., & Oliver, W. D. (2018) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.10.054062 · Cited by 423
“Second, the gate infidelity (the error per gate) due to energy relaxation follows = τ/T1 (We use 16 linearly independent input states when performing process tomography [39], and there is a prefactor difference from that estimated in randomized benchmarking [40]).”
MethodUniversal Gate for Fixed-Frequency Qubits via a Tunable Bus
McKay, D. C., Filipp, S., Mezzacapo, A., Magesan, E., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. M. (2016) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.6.064007 · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Authors
- Bialczak, R. C., Ansmann, M., Hofheinz, M., Lucero, E., Neeley, M., O’Connell, A. D., Sank, D., Wang, H., Wenner, J., Steffen, M., Cleland, A. N., & Martinis, J. M.
- Venue
- Nature Physics
- Published
- 2010-04-25
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 409-413
- ISSN
- 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-2481
- OpenAlex
- W2049737808
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantum process tomography of a universal entangling gate implemented with Josephson phase qubits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nphys1639
- The paper
- Bialczak, R. C., Ansmann, M., Hofheinz, M., Lucero, E., Neeley, M., O’Connell, A. D., Sank, D., Wang, H., Wenner, J., Steffen, M., Cleland, A. N., & Martinis, J. M. (2010). Quantum process tomography of a universal entangling gate implemented with Josephson phase qubits. Nature Physics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1639
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.