Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 860

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Spin-half paramagnetism in graphene induced by point defects

Open access
Nair, R. R., Sepioni, M., Tsai, I-Ling, Lehtinen, O., Keinonen, J., Krasheninnikov, A. V., Thomson, T., Geim, A. K., Grigorieva, I. V.·2012·Nature Physics

Abstract

The presence, or otherwise, of magnetism in graphene has been the subject of much debate. A systematic study of point defects—a widely suggested source of ferromagnetism in graphene—suggests that although they can exhibit net spin, they remain paramagnetic, even at liquid helium temperature. The possibility to induce a magnetic response in graphene by the introduction of defects has been generating much interest, as this would expand the already impressive list of its special properties and allow novel devices where charge and spin manipulation could be combined. So far there have been many theoretical studies (for reviews, see refs 1, 2, 3) predicting that point defects in graphene should carry magnetic moments μ∼μB and these can in principle couple (anti)ferromagnetically1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12. However, experimental evidence for such magnetism remains both scarce and controversial13,14,15,16. Here we show that point defects in graphene—(1) fluorine adatoms in concentrations x gradually increasing to stoichiometric fluorographene CFx=1.0 (ref. 17) and (2) irradiation defects (vacancies)—carry magnetic moments with spin 1/2. Both types of defect lead to notable paramagnetism but no magnetic ordering could be detected down to liquid helium temperatures. The induced paramagnetism dominates graphene’s low-temperature magnetic properties, despite the fact that the maximum response we could achieve was limited to one moment per approximately 1,000 carbon atoms. This limitation is explained by clustering of adatoms and, for the case of vacancies, by the loss of graphene’s structural stability. Our work clarifies the controversial issue of graphene’s magnetism and sets limits for other graphitic compounds.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphys2183

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 860

Metadata

Authors
Nair, R. R., Sepioni, M., Tsai, I.-L., Lehtinen, O., Keinonen, J., Krasheninnikov, A. V., Thomson, T., Geim, A. K., & Grigorieva, I. V.
Venue
Nature Physics
Published
2012-01-10
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
199-202
ISSN
  • 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-2481
OpenAlex
W2118678334
Cited by
860
References
0
FWCI
37.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spin-half paramagnetism in graphene induced by point defects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nphys2183
The paper
Nair, R. R., Sepioni, M., Tsai, I.-L., Lehtinen, O., Keinonen, J., Krasheninnikov, A. V., Thomson, T., Geim, A. K., & Grigorieva, I. V. (2012). Spin-half paramagnetism in graphene induced by point defects. Nature Physics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2183

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.