Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,089

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Direct observation of competition between superconductivity and charge density wave order in YBa2Cu3O6.67

Open access
Chang, J., Blackburn, E., Holmes, A. T., Christensen, N. B., Larsen, J., Mesot, J., Liang, Ruixing, Bonn, D. A., Hardy, W. N., Watenphul, A., Zimmermann, M. v., Forgan, E. M., Hayden, S. M.·2012·Nature Physics

Abstract

X-ray diffraction experiments reveal that spatial charge ordering occurs in the pseudogap state of YBa2Cu3O6.67. Moreover, this charge ordered state competes with high-temperature superconductivity, and their relative strengths can be tuned using a magnetic field. Superconductivity often emerges in the proximity of, or in competition with, symmetry-breaking ground states such as antiferromagnetism or charge density waves1,2,3,4,5 (CDW). A number of materials in the cuprate family, which includes the high transition-temperature (high-Tc) superconductors, show spin and charge density wave order5,6,7. Thus a fundamental question is to what extent do these ordered states exist for compositions close to optimal for superconductivity. Here we use high-energy X-ray diffraction to show that a CDW develops at zero field in the normal state of superconducting YBa2Cu3O6.67 (Tc = 67 K). This sample has a hole doping of 0.12 per copper and a well-ordered oxygen chain superstructure8. Below Tc, the application of a magnetic field suppresses superconductivity and enhances the CDW. Hence, the CDW and superconductivity in this typical high-Tc material are competing orders with similar energy scales, and the high-Tc superconductivity forms from a pre-existing CDW environment. Our results provide a mechanism for the formation of small Fermi surface pockets9, which explain the negative Hall and Seebeck effects10,11 and the ‘Tc plateau’12 in this material when underdoped.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphys2456

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,089

Metadata

Authors
Chang, J., Blackburn, E., Holmes, A. T., Christensen, N. B., Larsen, J., Mesot, J., Liang, R., Bonn, D. A., Hardy, W. N., Watenphul, A., Zimmermann, M. V., Forgan, E. M., & Hayden, S. M.
Venue
Nature Physics
Published
2012-10-14
Volume
8
Issue
12
Pages
871-876
ISSN
  • 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-2481
OpenAlex
W2096343998
Cited by
1,089
References
1
FWCI
61.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct observation of competition between superconductivity and charge density wave order in YBa2Cu3O6.67. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nphys2456
The paper
Chang, J., Blackburn, E., Holmes, A. T., Christensen, N. B., Larsen, J., Mesot, J., Liang, R., Bonn, D. A., Hardy, W. N., Watenphul, A., Zimmermann, M. V., Forgan, E. M., & Hayden, S. M. (2012). Direct observation of competition between superconductivity and charge density wave order in YBa2Cu3O6.67. Nature Physics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2456

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.