The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Parity–time-symmetric whispering-gallery microcavities
Open accessAbstract
Optical systems combining balanced loss and gain provide a unique platform to implement classical analogues of quantum systems described by non-Hermitian parity–time (PT)-symmetric Hamiltonians. Such systems can be used to create synthetic materials with properties that cannot be attained in materials having only loss or only gain. Here we report PT-symmetry breaking in coupled optical resonators. We observed non-reciprocity in the PT-symmetry-breaking phase due to strong field localization, which significantly enhances nonlinearity. In the linear regime, light transmission is reciprocal regardless of whether the symmetry is broken or unbroken. We show that in one direction there is a complete absence of resonance peaks whereas in the other direction the transmission is resonantly enhanced, a feature directly associated with the use of resonant structures. Our results could lead to a new generation of synthetic optical systems enabling on-chip manipulation and control of light propagation. It is now shown that coupled optical microcavities bear all the hallmarks of parity–time symmetry; that is, the system’s dynamics are unchanged by both time-reversal and mirror transformations. The resonant nature of microcavities results in unusual effects not seen in previous photonic analogues of parity–time-symmetric systems: for example, light travelling in one direction is resonantly enhanced but there are no resonance peaks going the other way.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians
Bender, C. M. (2007) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/70/6/r03 · Cited by 2,984
Self-citationUltra-high-Q toroid microcavity on a chip
Armani, D. K., Kippenberg, T. J., Spillane, S. M., & Vahala, K. J. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01371 · Cited by 2,214
Cited by
Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity
Chen, W., Kaya Özdemir, Ş., Zhao, G., Wiersig, J., & Yang, L. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23281 · Cited by 2,084
Self-citationParity–time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics
Özdemir, Ş. K., Rotter, S., Nori, F., & Yang, L. (2019) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-019-0304-9 · Cited by 1,773
Self-citationExceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems
Bergholtz, E. J., Budich, J. C., & Kunst, F. K. (2021) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.93.015005 · Cited by 1,711
Inverse design in nanophotonics
Molesky, S., Lin, Z., Piggott, A. Y., Jin, W., Vucković, J., & Rodriguez, A. W. (2018) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-018-0246-9 · Cited by 1,818
Spawning rings of exceptional points out of Dirac cones
Zhen, B., Hsu, C. W., Igarashi, Y., Lu, L., Kaminer, I., Pick, A., Chua, S.-L., Joannopoulos, J. D., & Soljačić, M. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14889 · Cited by 861
Metadata
- Authors
- Peng, B., Özdemir, Ş. K., Lei, F., Monifi, F., Gianfreda, M., Long, G. L., Fan, S., Nori, F., Bender, C. M., & Yang, L.
- Venue
- Nature Physics
- Published
- 2014-04-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 394-398
- ISSN
- 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-2481
- OpenAlex
- W1911969426
- Cited by
- 2,474
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 97.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parity–time-symmetric whispering-gallery microcavities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nphys2927
- The paper
- Peng, B., Özdemir, Ş. K., Lei, F., Monifi, F., Gianfreda, M., Long, G. L., Fan, S., Nori, F., Bender, C. M., & Yang, L. (2014). Parity–time-symmetric whispering-gallery microcavities. Nature Physics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2927
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.