Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Confined quantum Zeno dynamics of a watched atomic arrow

Open access
Signoles, Adrien, Facon, Adrien, Grosso, Dorian, Dotsenko, Igor, Haroche, Serge, Raimond, Jean-Michel, Brune, Michel, Gleyzes, Sébastien·2014·Nature Physics

Abstract

Repeatedly probing a quantum system restricts its evolution, providing a route for state engineering. Such confinement, described by quantum Zeno dynamics, has now been implemented to generate superposition states in a multi-level Rydberg atom. In a quantum world, a watched arrow never moves. This is the quantum Zeno effect1. Repeatedly asking a quantum system ‘are you still in your initial state?’ blocks its coherent evolution through measurement back-action. Quantum Zeno dynamics (QZD; refs 2, 3) gives more freedom to the system. Instead of pinning it to a single state, it sets a border in its evolution space. Repeatedly asking the system ‘are you beyond the border?’ makes this limit impenetrable. As the border can be designed by choosing the measured observable, QZD allows one to dynamically tailor the system’s Hilbert space. Recent proposals, particularly in the cavity quantum electrodynamics context4,5, highlight the interest of QZD for quantum state engineering tasks6,7,8,9,10,11, which are the key to quantum-enabled technologies and quantum information processing. We report the observation of QZD in the 51-dimensional Hilbert space of a large angular momentum J = 25. Continuous selective interrogation limits the evolution of this angular momentum to an adjustable multi-dimensional subspace. This confined dynamics leads to the production of non-classical ‘Schrödinger cat’ states12,13, quantum superpositions of angular momenta pointing in different directions. These states are promising for sensitive metrology of electric and magnetic fields. This QZD approach could also be generalized to cavity and circuit quantum electrodynamics experiments4,5,13 by replacing the angular momentum with a photonic harmonic oscillator.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphys3076

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Signoles, A., Facon, A., Grosso, D., Dotsenko, I., Haroche, S., Raimond, J.-M., Brune, M., & Gleyzes, S.
Venue
Nature Physics
Published
2014-08-31
Volume
10
Issue
10
Pages
715-719
ISSN
  • 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-2481
OpenAlex
W2082214958
Cited by
162
References
0
FWCI
9.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Confined quantum Zeno dynamics of a watched atomic arrow. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nphys3076
The paper
Signoles, A., Facon, A., Grosso, D., Dotsenko, I., Haroche, S., Raimond, J.-M., Brune, M., & Gleyzes, S. (2014). Confined quantum Zeno dynamics of a watched atomic arrow. Nature Physics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3076

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.