The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Critical phenomena in atmospheric precipitation
Open accessAbstract
Critical phenomena occur near continuous phase transitions. As a tuning parameter crosses its critical value, an order parameter increases as a power law. At criticality, order-parameter fluctuations diverge and their spatial correlation decays as a power law1. In systems where the tuning parameter and order parameter are coupled, the critical point can become an attractor, and self-organized criticality (SOC) results2,3. Here we argue, using satellite data, that a critical value of water vapour (the tuning parameter) marks a non-equilibrium continuous phase transition to a regime of strong atmospheric convection and precipitation (the order parameter)—with correlated regions on scales of tens to hundreds of kilometres. Despite the complexity of atmospheric dynamics, we find that important observables conform to the simple functional forms predicted by the theory of critical phenomena. In meteorology the term 'quasi-equilibrium' refers to a balance between slow large-scale driving processes and rapid release of buoyancy by moist convection4. Our study indicates that the attractive quasi-equilibrium state, postulated long before SOC (ref. 5), is the critical point of a continuous phase transition and is thus an instance of SOC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Westra, S., Fowler, H. J., Evans, J. P., Alexander, L. V., Berg, P., Johnson, F., Kendon, E. J., Lenderink, G., & Roberts, N. M. (2014) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1002/2014rg000464 · Cited by 1,533
Emergent complex neural dynamics
Chialvo, D. R. (2010) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1803 · Cited by 1,165
DYAMOND: the DYnamics of the Atmospheric general circulation Modeled On Non-hydrostatic Domains
Stevens, B., Satoh, M., Auger, L., Biercamp, J., Bretherton, C. S., Chen, X., Düben, P., Judt, F., Khairoutdinov, M., Klocke, D., et al. (2019) · Progress in Earth and Planetary Science · doi:10.1186/s40645-019-0304-z · Cited by 586
Jiang, X., Waliser, D. E., Xavier, P. K., Petch, J., Klingaman, N. P., Woolnough, S. J., Guan, B., Bellon, G., Crueger, T., DeMott, C., et al. (2015) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1002/2014jd022375 · Cited by 393
The Moist Static Energy Budget of a Composite Tropical Intraseasonal Oscillation in a Climate Model
Maloney, E. D. (2009) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/2008jcli2542.1 · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- Peters, O., & Neelin, J. D.
- Venue
- Nature Physics
- Published
- 2006-05-28
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 393-396
- ISSN
- 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-2481
- OpenAlex
- W1973552149
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical phenomena in atmospheric precipitation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nphys314
- The paper
- Peters, O., & Neelin, J. D. (2006). Critical phenomena in atmospheric precipitation. Nature Physics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys314
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.