Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accelerated quantum control using superadiabatic dynamics in a solid-state lambda system

Open access
Zhou, Brian B., Baksic, Alexandre, Ribeiro, Hugo, Yale, Christopher G., Heremans, F. Joseph, Jerger, Paul C., Auer, Adrian, Burkard, Guido, Clerk, Aashish A., Awschalom, David D.·2017·Nature Physics

Abstract

Adiabatic processes are useful in quantum control, but they are slow. A way around this is to exploit shortcuts to adiabaticity, which can speed things up — for instance, by boosting stimulated Raman adiabatic passage. Adiabatic processes are useful for quantum technologies1,2,3 but, despite their robustness to experimental imperfections, they remain susceptible to decoherence due to their long evolution time. A general strategy termed shortcuts to adiabaticity4,5,6,7,8,9 (STA) aims to remedy this vulnerability by designing fast dynamics to reproduce the results of a slow, adiabatic evolution. Here, we implement an STA technique known as superadiabatic transitionless driving10 (SATD) to speed up stimulated Raman adiabatic passage1,11,12,13,14 in a solid-state lambda system. Using the optical transitions to a dissipative excited state in the nitrogen-vacancy centre in diamond, we demonstrate the accelerated performance of different shortcut trajectories for population transfer and for the initialization and transfer of coherent superpositions. We reveal that SATD protocols exhibit robustness to dissipation and experimental uncertainty, and can be optimized when these effects are present. These results suggest that STA could be effective for controlling a variety of solid-state open quantum systems11,12,13,14,15,16.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphys3967

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Holonomic quantum computation

    Zanardi, P., & Rasetti, M. (1999) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(99)00803-8 · Cited by 1,006

  • Quantum simulation of frustrated Ising spins with trapped ions

    Kim, K., Chang, M.-S., Korenblit, S., Islam, R., Edwards, E. E., Freericks, J. K., Lin, G.-D., Duan, L.-M., & Monroe, C. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09071 · Cited by 750 · cited 1×

    “rices, and 5Ü are the corresponding real coefficients, which are plotted in Fig. 4c. The fidelity à is then computed 11 from é via à L mtrF § ¥éê ¥éG q 6 L {ΨçÔåÚØç+éΨçÔåÚØç (3) where ê L|ΨçÔåÚØçΨçÔåÚØç| is the density matrix of the ideal target superposition. Superadiabatic Protocols To speed up adiabatic protocols,…”
  • High-fidelity quantum driving

    Bason, M. G., Viteau, M., Malossi, N., Huillery, P., Arimondo, E., Ciampini, D., Fazio, R., Giovannetti, V., Mannella, R., & Morsch, O. (2012) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2170 · Cited by 462

Show all 3 references

Metadata

Authors
Zhou, B. B., Baksic, A., Ribeiro, H., Yale, C. G., Heremans, F. J., Jerger, P. C., Auer, A., Burkard, G., Clerk, A. A., & Awschalom, D. D.
Venue
Nature Physics
Published
2016-11-28
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
330-334
ISSN
  • 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-2481
OpenAlex
W2496556349
Cited by
257
References
3
FWCI
14.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accelerated quantum control using superadiabatic dynamics in a solid-state lambda system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nphys3967
The paper
Zhou, B. B., Baksic, A., Ribeiro, H., Yale, C. G., Heremans, F. J., Jerger, P. C., Auer, A., Burkard, G., Clerk, A. A., & Awschalom, D. D. (2017). Accelerated quantum control using superadiabatic dynamics in a solid-state lambda system. Nature Physics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3967

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.