The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Entanglement and the foundations of statistical mechanics
Open accessAbstract
Statistical mechanics is one of the most successful areas of physics. Yet, almost 150 years since its inception, its foundations and basic postulates are still the subject of debate. Here we suggest that the main postulate of statistical mechanics, the equal a priori probability postulate, should be abandoned as misleading and unnecessary. We argue that it should be replaced by a general canonical principle, whose physical content is fundamentally different from the postulate it replaces: it refers to individual states, rather than to ensemble or time averages. Furthermore, whereas the original postulate is an unprovable assumption, the principle we propose is mathematically proven. The key element in this proof is the quantum entanglement between the system and its environment. Our approach separates the issue of finding the canonical state from finding out how close a system is to it, allowing us to go even beyond the usual boltzmannian situation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Non-Markovian quantum dynamics: Correlated projection superoperators and Hilbert space averaging
Breuer, H.-P., Gemmer, J., & Michel, M. (2006) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.73.016139 · Cited by 134
Cited by
Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems
Polkovnikov, A., Sengupta, K., Silva, A., & Vengalattore, M. (2011) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.863 · Cited by 2,562
Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes
McClean, J. R., Boixo, S., Smelyanskiy, V. N., Babbush, R., & Neven, H. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07090-4 · Cited by 2,329
Quantum many-body systems out of equilibrium
Eisert, J., Friesdorf, M., & Gogolin, C. (2015) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3215 · Cited by 1,255
Vinjanampathy, S., & Anders, J. (2016) · Contemporary Physics · doi:10.1080/00107514.2016.1201896 · Cited by 937
Entanglement renormalization and holography
Swingle, B. (2012) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.065007 · Cited by 915
Metadata
- Authors
- Popescu, S., Short, A. J., & Winter, A.
- Venue
- Nature Physics
- Published
- 2006-10-29
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 754-758
- ISSN
- 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-2481
- OpenAlex
- W2094810855
- Cited by
- 1,057
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Entanglement and the foundations of statistical mechanics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nphys444
- The paper
- Popescu, S., Short, A. J., & Winter, A. (2006). Entanglement and the foundations of statistical mechanics. Nature Physics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys444
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.